Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of a Bayesian program with three microcomputer programs for predicting gentamicin concentrations.

P J Godley1, J T Black, P A Frohna

  • 1Department of Pharmacy, University College of Pharmacy, Austin 78712.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Home-based virtual reality for chronic pain: protocol for an NIH-supported randomised-controlled trial.

BMJ open·2021
Same author

Randomized trials of alcohol-use interventions with college students and their parents: lessons from the Transitions Project.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2011
Same author

Automated medication distribution systems and compliance with Joint Commission standards.

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists·2002
Same author

Neurological and neuropathologic heterogeneity in two brothers with cobalamin C deficiency.

Annals of neurology·2001
Same author

Employer-sponsored health insurance: are employers good agents for their employees?

The Milbank quarterly·2000
Same author

The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerance of cefepime administered as an intravenous bolus or as a rapid infusion.

The Annals of pharmacotherapy·2000
Same journal

A Novel Dosing Strategy for Tacrolimus in Lung Transplant Recipients: Integrating Machine Learning with Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis.

Therapeutic drug monitoring·2026
Same journal

Recommendations for Assessing Methodological Quality in Systematic Reviews of Population Pharmacokinetic Models: A Systematic Review.

Therapeutic drug monitoring·2026
Same journal

Wide-Range Quantification of Belumosudil in Patients with Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography.

Therapeutic drug monitoring·2026
Same journal

Deltamethrin Placental Transfer and Seasonal Pyrethroid Exposure: A Mother-Newborn Dyad Pilot Study.

Therapeutic drug monitoring·2026
Same journal

A Clustering-Based Grey Modeling Approach for Tacrolimus Concentration Prediction Under Sparse Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Therapeutic drug monitoring·2026
Same journal

Response to Panteghini "About Analytical Performance Specifications for Immunosuppressive Drug Measurements".

Therapeutic drug monitoring·2026
See all related articles

This study compared Bayesian pharmacokinetic dosing programs for aminoglycosides. Koup's Bayesian program showed more precise predictions for serum gentamicin concentrations using single trough levels.

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Pharmacometrics
  • Bayesian Statistics

Background:

  • Aminoglycoside dosing requires precise pharmacokinetic monitoring.
  • Existing dosing programs vary in predictive accuracy.
  • Bayesian regression offers a potential improvement for gentamicin dosing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare a new Bayesian regression program with existing aminoglycoside pharmacokinetic dosing programs.
  • To evaluate the predictive performance of different methods for serum gentamicin concentrations (SGC).
  • To assess the precision and bias of peak and trough SGC predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 152 SGCs from 30 adult patients.
  • Comparison of a new Bayesian program against three established dosing programs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculation of Mean Error (ME), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE).
  • Statistical comparison of prediction bias and precision using 95% confidence intervals.

    • Main Results:

    • No significant differences in MAE for peak SGC predictions, except for the Brater program using single trough SGC.
    • Koup's Bayesian program demonstrated statistically more precise trough SGC predictions using a single concentration.
    • Significant differences in ME were observed among predictive methods for both peak and trough SGCs.

    Conclusions:

    • Bayesian pharmacokinetic dosing programs, particularly Koup's, offer precise predictions for gentamicin.
    • Single trough SGC measurements can be effectively utilized with appropriate Bayesian models.
    • Optimized dosing strategies are crucial for effective aminoglycoside therapy.