Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026
Assessment of Bone Fracture Healing Using Micro-Computed Tomography
Published on: December 9, 2022
Effect of Image Resolution and Compression on Fractal Analysis of the Periapical Bone
Shiva Toghyani1, Ibrahim Nasseh2, Georges Aoun3
1Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Diagnosis and Oral Health, University of Louisville, School of Dentistry, USA.
Introduction:
Fractal dimension (FD) on periapical radiographs is used as a simple descriptor of the complex architecture of the trabecular bone surrounding the dentition. It is used on periapical and panoramic radiographs as a descriptor of the complex architecture of trabecular bone surrounding teeth.
Aim:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of image resolution and different compression levels on fractal dimension of alveolar bone with images obtained using storage phosphor plate (SPP) system.
Methods:
Periapical images of premolar and molar teeth on both sides of three dry human mandibles were obtained with Digora Optime (Soredex Corp., Helsinki, Finland) SPP system. The SPPs were exposed equally and scanned immediately after exposure with standard, high and very high resolutions. All the images then were compressed and saved by degrees of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% and 90%. FD was calculated using public domain software (ImageJ with FracLac plug-in) on two non-overlapping regions of interest (ROIs) on premolar and molar periapical bone areas of each radiograph using differential box-counting method. The ROIs on corresponding images were of the same size and position. FDs were compared using two-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison tests (p=0.05).
Results:
There was no significant difference in FD calculations in different levels of compression for all the resolutions. Images obtained with high resolution scans showed significantly lower variation in FD values compared to very high and standard resolutions for all compressions (p<0.0001).
Conclusion:
The high resolution demonstrated the lowest variation in FD values in all levels of compression which makes it the most reliable and consistent resolution for measuring the FD values. The level of compression does not make a significant difference in FD values for all the scan resolutions. Scanning resolution of SPPs should be carefully chosen when evaluating the change in FD of alveolar bone for various bone disorders.
