Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
Feasibility of Using Communication Coaching to Teach Palliative Care Clinicians Motivational Interviewing
Kathryn I Pollak1, Xiaomei Gao2, Robert M Arnold3
1Cancer Control and Populations Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Context:
Palliative care clinicians often have challenging conversations with patients or family caregivers who express ambivalence about goals or feel reluctant to discuss topics. Motivational Interviewing (MI) has tools to address ambivalence and reluctance.
Objective:
The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an MI communication coaching intervention.
Methods:
We enrolled 22 palliative care clinicians and randomly assigned half to receive communication coaching versus wait-list control. The coaching entailed a lecture on MI, a 1:1 session to discuss applying MI, and audio recording and receiving feedback on four encounters (two separate times). Palliative care clinicians in the wait-list control arm audio-recorded four encounters. Coders blinded to study arm coded MI behaviors. We surveyed patients, caregivers, and clinicians after all audio-recorded encounters to assess perceptions of the encounter. The analyses were performed using a repeated-measures mixed model.
Results:
We found the intervention to be feasible and acceptable. Eighty-six percent of those enrolled completed all study activities including coaching sessions, audio-recording encounters, and completing surveys. Of those in the intervention arm, 88% rated the intervention as helpful and 100% would recommend it to a colleague. Compared to control clinicians, intervention clinicians had higher ratings of their MI skills after intervention, higher objectively rated communication skills, and slightly better burnout scores. We found no arm differences in patient, caregiver, or clinician ratings of satisfaction.
Conclusion:
This pilot study indicates that coaching palliative care clinicians is feasible and shows promise that coaching can improve palliative care clinician communication.
Related Concept Videos
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Therapeutic Communication
Verbal communication depends on language or a prescribed way of using words so that people can share information effectively. The critical aspects of verbal...
Techniques of therapeutic communication I: Active Listening, Sharing Observations, Validation, and Using Touch
Therapeutic communication is not the same as social interaction. Social interaction has no goal or purpose and consists of casual information sharing, whereas therapeutic communication has a plan or purpose for the conversation. Therapeutic...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process I: Assessment and Diagnosis
The nursing process considers the patient's emotional and physical well-being. The process can be repeated or stopped at any point if judged essential. Assessment is the first step in the nursing...

