Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.4K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

842
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
842
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Introduction to Cognitive Psychology01:20

Introduction to Cognitive Psychology

2.1K
Cognitive psychology is the field of psychology dedicated to examining how people think. It attempts to explain how and why we think the way we do by studying the interactions among human thinking, emotion, creativity, language, and problem-solving, as well as other cognitive processes. Cognitive psychology studies how information is processed and manipulated in remembering, thinking, and knowing.
This field emerged in the mid-20th century, following a period dominated by behaviorism, which...
2.1K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Neural variability in the medial prefrontal cortex contributes to efficient adaptive behavior.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

The dual-path hypothesis for the emergence of anosognosia in Alzheimer's disease.

Frontiers in neurology·2023
Same author

Detecting Anosognosia from the Prodromal Stage of Alzheimer's Disease.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2023
Same author

Additively Combining Utilities and Beliefs: Research Gaps and Algorithmic Developments.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2021
Same author

Computational models of adaptive behavior and prefrontal cortex.

Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology·2021
Same author

Imprecise neural computations as a source of adaptive behaviour in volatile environments.

Nature human behaviour·2020
Same journal

Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.3K

Human Decision-Making beyond the Rational Decision Theory.

Etienne Koechlin1

  • 1Ecole Normale Superieure, PSL Research University, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Biomédicale, Paris, France.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|November 27, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Recent studies challenge the Subjective Expected Utility (SEU) hypothesis, a foundational model for human decision-making. This research suggests a new framework integrating decision-making and adaptive behavior is needed.

More Related Videos

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.3K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.3K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.3K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroeconomics
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • The Subjective Expected Utility (SEU) hypothesis has long been a dominant model for understanding human decision-making under uncertainty.
  • Empirical evidence has increasingly revealed limitations and deviations from SEU predictions in real-world scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present compelling evidence that refutes the Subjective Expected Utility (SEU) hypothesis as a comprehensive model of human decision-making.
  • To propose the foundational elements for a new theoretical framework that integrates decision-making and adaptive behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Review and synthesis of findings from two recent independent studies (Farashahi et al. and Rouault et al.).
  • Analysis of experimental data and theoretical arguments presented in the cited studies.

Main Results:

  • Both studies provide robust evidence demonstrating systematic departures from SEU predictions in human choices.
  • The findings highlight the inadequacy of the SEU model in capturing the complexities of human decision-making.

Conclusions:

  • The Subjective Expected Utility (SEU) hypothesis is insufficient as a sole explanatory model for human decision-making.
  • A new, unified model is required that incorporates adaptive behavior alongside decision-making processes to better reflect psychological reality.