Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Current Review of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Use in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device
Jacinthe Boulet1, Emmanuelle Massie1, Blandine Mondésert2,3
1Department of Medicine, Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Insights
The role of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is debated. While some patients may benefit, routine use requires further study to assess survival benefits and risks.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are recommended for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction.
- The utility of ICDs in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), particularly continuous-flow (CF) devices, is controversial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current evidence and ongoing debate regarding the role of ICDs in LVAD patients.
- To evaluate the risks and benefits of ICDs in the context of LVAD support.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature, including case reports and small retrospective series.
- Analysis of the frequency and outcomes of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in LVAD patients.
- Assessment of potential benefits and risks associated with ICDs in this population.
Main Results:
- Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are common in LVAD patients and linked to poorer outcomes.
- Current data on ICD efficacy in LVAD patients are limited.
- While many LVAD patients have ICDs, some may not benefit and face risks like inappropriate shocks and psychological distress.
Conclusions:
- The benefit of routine ICD implantation in all LVAD patients is uncertain.
- ICDs may offer advantages for specific CF-LVAD patients at high risk of VA and hemodynamic collapse.
- A randomized controlled trial is necessary to determine the survival impact of routine ICDs in low-risk CF-LVAD patients.
Purpose Of Review:
While use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction is recommended, their role in patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) remains controversial, especially with continuous flow (CF) devices.
Recent Findings:
Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in LVAD patients are frequent and associated with worse outcomes, especially postoperatively. Data on the role of ICDs in LVAD patients are scarce, based on case reports or small retrospective series. While the majority of LVAD patients currently have an ICD, it seems that some might not derive any benefit, with additional risks in terms of inappropriate shocks, psychological distress, and infections. Some CF-LVAD patients are at high risk of VA and hemodynamic collapse; under those circumstances, an ICD might provide benefits. A randomized-controlled trial of routine ICD implantation in CF-LVAD would be needed to clarify their impact on survival in low risk patients.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management