Prevalence of Errors in Anaphylaxis in Kids (PEAK): A Multicenter Simulation-Based Study

Tensing Maa1, Daniel J Scherzer2, Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky3

  • 1Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.

Insights

Pediatric anaphylaxis management varies significantly across international healthcare institutions, with frequent medication errors and safety concerns identified during simulated scenarios. Improving protocols and ensuring epinephrine availability are crucial for better patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Patient Safety
  • Healthcare Systems Analysis

Background:

  • International practice variation in pediatric anaphylaxis management is not well-documented.
  • Understanding this variation is essential for improving care quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize variability in epinephrine administration for pediatric anaphylaxis across institutions.
  • To identify the frequency and types of medication errors during anaphylaxis management.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, observational study using standardized in situ simulated anaphylaxis scenarios.
  • Simulations conducted across 28 healthcare institutions in 6 countries involving on-duty teams.
  • Data collected on team demographics, institutional protocols, epinephrine timing, medication errors, and safety issues.

Main Results:

  • Anaphylaxis guidelines were present in only 41% of institutions; cognitive aids were used infrequently for medication dosing (41%) and preparation (32%).
  • Epinephrine autoinjectors were unavailable in 54% of sites and used in only 14% of simulations.
  • Medication errors occurred in 68% of simulations, with nursing experience associated with fewer errors. Latent safety threats were identified in 30% of institutions.

Conclusions:

  • Significant institutional variation exists in pediatric anaphylaxis management, including protocol use, cognitive aids, and medication availability.
  • Frequent errors involving epinephrine administration and latent safety threats highlight critical areas for improvement.
  • Enhancing protocols, ensuring autoinjector availability, and optimizing cognitive aid use are vital for safer pediatric anaphylaxis care.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Allergic Reactions02:06

Allergic Reactions

Overview
31.8K
Allergic Drug Reactions01:27

Allergic Drug Reactions

Allergic reactions related to drugs are hypersensitivity responses driven by the immune system and bear no connection to the drug's therapeutic action. While drugs in isolation do not trigger an immune response, they can interact with endogenous proteins to form antigens. These antigens stimulate lymphocytes to produce antibodies. IgE-type antibodies attach themselves to mast cells. Upon subsequent exposure to the same stimulus, the antigen-antibody interaction is initiated, unleashing...
1.3K
Pharmacovigilance01:19

Pharmacovigilance

Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
1.5K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.3K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.4K