Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Measuring Local Anaphylaxis in Mice
Published on: October 14, 2014
Prevalence of Errors in Anaphylaxis in Kids (PEAK): A Multicenter Simulation-Based Study
Tensing Maa1, Daniel J Scherzer2, Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky3
1Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Insights
Pediatric anaphylaxis management varies significantly across international healthcare institutions, with frequent medication errors and safety concerns identified during simulated scenarios. Improving protocols and ensuring epinephrine availability are crucial for better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Patient Safety
- Healthcare Systems Analysis
Background:
- International practice variation in pediatric anaphylaxis management is not well-documented.
- Understanding this variation is essential for improving care quality.
Purpose of the Study:
- To characterize variability in epinephrine administration for pediatric anaphylaxis across institutions.
- To identify the frequency and types of medication errors during anaphylaxis management.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, observational study using standardized in situ simulated anaphylaxis scenarios.
- Simulations conducted across 28 healthcare institutions in 6 countries involving on-duty teams.
- Data collected on team demographics, institutional protocols, epinephrine timing, medication errors, and safety issues.
Main Results:
- Anaphylaxis guidelines were present in only 41% of institutions; cognitive aids were used infrequently for medication dosing (41%) and preparation (32%).
- Epinephrine autoinjectors were unavailable in 54% of sites and used in only 14% of simulations.
- Medication errors occurred in 68% of simulations, with nursing experience associated with fewer errors. Latent safety threats were identified in 30% of institutions.
Conclusions:
- Significant institutional variation exists in pediatric anaphylaxis management, including protocol use, cognitive aids, and medication availability.
- Frequent errors involving epinephrine administration and latent safety threats highlight critical areas for improvement.
- Enhancing protocols, ensuring autoinjector availability, and optimizing cognitive aid use are vital for safer pediatric anaphylaxis care.
Background:
Multi-institutional, international practice variation of pediatric anaphylaxis management by health care providers has not been reported.
Objective:
To characterize variability in epinephrine administration for pediatric anaphylaxis across institutions, including frequency and types of medication errors.
Methods:
A prospective, observational, study using a standardized in situ simulated anaphylaxis scenario was performed across 28 health care institutions in 6 countries. The on-duty health care team was called for a child (patient simulator) in anaphylaxis. Real medications and supplies were obtained from their actual locations. Demographic data about team members, institutional protocols for anaphylaxis, timing of epinephrine delivery, medication errors, and systems safety issues discovered during the simulation were collected.
Results:
Thirty-seven in situ simulations were performed. Anaphylaxis guidelines existed in 41% (15 of 37) of institutions. Teams used a cognitive aid for medication dosing 41% (15 of 37) of the time and 32% (12 of 37) for preparation. Epinephrine autoinjectors were not available in 54% (20 of 37) of institutions and were used in only 14% (5 of 37) of simulations. Median time to epinephrine administration was 95 seconds (interquartile range, 77-252) for epinephrine autoinjector and 263 seconds (interquartile range, 146-407.5) for manually prepared epinephrine (P = .12). At least 1 medication error occurred in 68% (25 of 37) of simulations. Nursing experience with epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis was associated with fewer preparation (P = .04) and administration (P = .01) errors. Latent safety threats were reported by 30% (11 of 37) of institutions, and more than half of these (6 of 11) involved a cognitive aid.
Conclusions:
A multicenter, international study of simulated pediatric anaphylaxis reveals (1) variation in management between institutions in the use of protocols, cognitive aids, and medication formularies, (2) frequent errors involving epinephrine, and (3) latent safety threats related to cognitive aids among multiple sites.
More Related Videos
04:34Mouse Body Temperature Measurement Using Infrared Thermometer During Passive Systemic Anaphylaxis and Food Allergy Evaluation
Published on: September 14, 2018
07:10Application of Biochip Microfluidic Technology to Detect Serum Allergen-specific Immunoglobulin E sIgE
Published on: April 21, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions
Allergic Drug Reactions
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...