Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
Published on: May 17, 2024
Improving the Accuracy of Newborn Weight Classification
Kathy Kay Pickerel1, Julee Waldrop1, Emily Freeman2
1The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, United States of America.
Insights
The Olsen and Fenton growth references more accurately classify newborn weight for gestational age than the Lubchenco reference, potentially reducing risks like hypoglycemia for term infants.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Growth Standards
- Quality Improvement Science
Background:
- Accurate classification of newborn weight for gestational age is crucial for identifying infants at risk for adverse outcomes.
- The Lubchenco growth reference is widely used but may not accurately reflect current infant populations.
- Updated growth references are needed to improve the identification of small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA) infants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To enhance the accuracy of newborn weight classification using the Olsen regional growth reference compared to the Lubchenco reference.
- To determine the impact of using updated growth references on SGA, appropriate for gestational age (AGA), and LGA classifications in term infants.
Main Methods:
- Quality improvement methods guided by Lewin's Change Theory were employed.
- Term infants (N=314) at an academic medical center were evaluated using Lubchenco and other preferred growth references.
- Nursing and provider staff received education on the new growth reference interpretation.
Main Results:
- The Olsen regional growth reference identified more infants as small for gestational age (SGA) and fewer as large for gestational age (LGA).
- Post hoc analysis using the Fenton global growth reference yielded similar results, identifying more SGA and fewer LGA infants.
- No statistically significant difference was observed between the Olsen and Fenton growth references.
Conclusions:
- Updated growth references, such as Olsen and Fenton, provide more accurate infant weight-for-gestational age classification than the Lubchenco reference.
- Improved classification may lead to better identification and management of at-risk newborns.
- This practice change has the potential to decrease newborn health risks, including hypoglycemia.
Purpose:
The purpose of this project was to improve the accuracy of newborn weight classification using a regional newborn growth reference (Olsen), an evidence-based method, to determine SGA, AGA and LGA in term infants compared to the current growth reference (Lubchenco).
Design:
Quality improvement methods using Lewin's Change Theory guided the process.
Setting/Local Problem:
At an academic medical center term infants were evaluated for weight-for-gestational age using the Lubchenco growth reference as well as other growth references based on provider preference.
Patients:
All term newborns (N = 314) admitted to the newborn nursery during one month following a 3-months implementation of the practice change.
Intervention/Measurements:
Newborn nursery nursing staff and provider staff were provided education and training on using and interpreting the new growth reference.
Results:
Use of the Olsen regional growth reference identified more infants as small and fewer infants as large for gestational age. Post hoc analysis with a more global growth reference (Fenton) also identified more infants as small and fewer infants as large for gestational age. There was no statistically significant difference between the Olsen or Fenton growth references.
Conclusion:
Use of either of these two updated growth references more accurately classifies infant weight for gestational age compared to the Lubchenco growth reference, potentially decreasing newborn health risks such as hypoglycemia.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Improving Translational Accuracy
Improving Translational Accuracy

