Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Academic independence?

EMBO reports·2026
Same author

How do authors want to use AI for review? : A survey to assess the perception of scientists who received both AI and human reviews of their manuscripts.

EMBO reports·2026
Same author

EMBO Press co-evolves with molecular ecology and evolutionary biology.

The EMBO journal·2026
Same author

Equitable Open Access.

EMBO reports·2025
Same author

Coming of age: EMBO reports at 25.

EMBO reports·2025
Same author

Student hostages in culture war.

EMBO reports·2025
Same journal

PARG inhibition reduces ssDNA levels and limits RPA loading upon replication fork collapse.

EMBO reports·2026
Same journal

GATOR1 signaling defects promote astrocytic metabolic rewiring and excitatory neurotransmitter cycling.

EMBO reports·2026
Same journal

Lipid droplets promote aberrant liquid-liquid phase separation of alpha-synuclein impairing energy homeostasis.

EMBO reports·2026
Same journal

Publisher Correction: Collagen VI is a fibrosis-associated signal disrupting muscle regeneration across distinct human myopathies.

EMBO reports·2026
Same journal

Food for thought : The role of life cycle thinking in sustainable food system transitions.

EMBO reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Compost Microcosms as Microbially Diverse, Natural-like Environments for Microbiome Research in Caenorhabditis elegans
07:19

Compost Microcosms as Microbially Diverse, Natural-like Environments for Microbiome Research in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: September 13, 2022

2.6K

Review Commons-pre-journal peer review.

Thomas Lemberger1, Bernd Pulverer1

  • 1EMBO, Heidelberg, Germany.

EMBO Reports
|December 3, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

EMBO Press and ASAPbio introduce Review Commons, a new platform offering journal-independent peer review for scientific manuscripts and preprints. This initiative aims to streamline the peer review process for researchers.

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.4K
Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research
09:10

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Published on: September 22, 2021

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Compost Microcosms as Microbially Diverse, Natural-like Environments for Microbiome Research in Caenorhabditis elegans
07:19

Compost Microcosms as Microbially Diverse, Natural-like Environments for Microbiome Research in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: September 13, 2022

2.6K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.4K
Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research
09:10

Establishing an Octopus Ecosystem for Biomedical and Bioengineering Research

Published on: September 22, 2021

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Life Sciences
  • Biomedical Research
  • Scientific Publishing

Background:

  • The traditional peer review process can be lengthy and inconsistent.
  • Authors often face repeated reviews for the same work across different journals.
  • Preprints are increasingly used, but peer review remains crucial for validation.

Discussion:

  • Review Commons provides a centralized system for manuscript evaluation, independent of specific journals.
  • It allows authors to receive and share peer reviews before or during submission to a journal.
  • This model decouples peer review from journal selection, potentially increasing efficiency.

Key Insights:

  • Offers a transparent and efficient pathway for scientific peer review.
  • Facilitates constructive feedback on research manuscripts and preprints.
  • Aims to reduce reviewer fatigue and accelerate scientific communication.

Outlook:

  • Potential to reshape scholarly publishing by standardizing peer review.
  • Could encourage wider adoption of preprints with validated reviews.
  • May lead to faster dissemination of reliable scientific findings.