Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026
Mechanical Micronization of Lipoaspirates for Regenerative Therapy
Published on: March 15, 2019
A Study on the Effective Ratio of Fat to Stromal Vascular Fraction for Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer
Yong Chan Bae1,2, Kyoung Hoon Kim1, Hye Jin Yun2
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, 179 Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan, 49241, Korea.
Background:
Fat grafting, used for soft tissue augmentation during aesthetic or reconstructive plastic surgery, has disadvantages of low efficiency and unpredictable resorption rate. As an alternative, cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL) is widely used because of its simplicity and low fat resorption rate. However, relevant studies on optimal CAL parameters are still lacking. Here, we aimed to identify the most effective ratio of fat to stromal vascular fraction (SVF) for CAL.
Methods:
We designed two experimental paradigms. The first involved four groups of mice, each group injected with varying ratios of fat and SVF purified from different amounts of fat from a fixed amount of harvested fat. The second experiment involved four groups of mice, each injected with varying amounts of SVF mixed with a fixed amount of fat tissue. The amount of surviving fat in both experiments was compared 8 weeks after fat transplantation.
Results:
In the first experiment, the group injected with only fat, without consuming any of the harvested fat for SVF purification, showed the greatest mean volume and weight. In the second experiment, groups with 1:1 or more ratio of fat to SVF showed greater volume and weight than the group without SVF. Notably, a ratio of 1:1 did not give significantly different results than higher ratios.
Conclusions:
Thus, when a limited amount of fat tissue is available, using all of it for grafting is the most effective. However, if an adequate amount is available, using a fat-to-SVF ratio of 1:1 is the most efficient.
No Level Assigned:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
