Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
An international multidisciplinary consensus statement on fasting before procedural sedation in adults and children
S M Green1, P L Leroy2, M G Roback3
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Insights
Current fasting guidelines for procedural sedation often exceed necessary thresholds, leading to adverse effects without reducing aspiration risk. New recommendations propose less restrictive, risk-stratified fasting protocols for procedural sedation.
Area of Science:
- Medical Sciences
- Anesthesiology
- Patient Safety
Background:
- Current fasting practices for procedural sedation are often prolonged and lack evidence supporting their efficacy in preventing aspiration.
- Prolonged fasting can lead to adverse patient outcomes such as dehydration and irritability.
- The risk of clinically significant aspiration during procedural sedation is demonstrably low.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish evidence-based, risk-stratified fasting and aspiration prevention recommendations specifically for procedural sedation.
- To challenge existing overly restrictive fasting guidelines based on current evidence.
Main Methods:
- Extensive literature review to assess evidence robustness.
- Delphi methodology employed for consensus development.
- Risk stratification algorithm developed based on patient factors, comorbidities, procedure type, and sedation technique.
Main Results:
- Fasting guidelines often exceed recommended times and do not guarantee an empty stomach.
- No clear association exists between adherence to common fasting guidelines and reduced aspiration risk.
- A negligible probability of clinically important aspiration and low mortality rates were observed in procedural sedation compared to general anesthesia.
Conclusions:
- Fasting strategies for procedural sedation can be less restrictive than currently practiced.
- A consensus-derived algorithm allows for graded fasting precautions based on individual patient risk assessment.
- These recommendations provide a resource for practitioners and policymakers in procedural sedation globally.
Abstract:
The multidisciplinary International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation presents the first fasting and aspiration prevention recommendations specific to procedural sedation, based on an extensive review of the literature. These were developed using Delphi methodology and assessment of the robustness of the available evidence. The literature evidence is clear that fasting, as currently practiced, often substantially exceeds recommended time thresholds and has known adverse consequences, for example, irritability, dehydration and hypoglycaemia. Fasting does not guarantee an empty stomach, and there is no observed association between aspiration and compliance with common fasting guidelines. The probability of clinically important aspiration during procedural sedation is negligible. In the post-1984 literature there are no published reports of aspiration-associated mortality in children, no reports of death in healthy adults (ASA physical status 1 or 2) and just nine reported deaths in adults of ASA physical status 3 or above. Current concerns about aspiration are out of proportion to the actual risk. Given the lower observed frequency of aspiration and mortality than during general anaesthesia, and the theoretical basis for assuming a lesser risk, fasting strategies in procedural sedation can reasonably be less restrictive. We present a consensus-derived algorithm in which each patient is first risk-stratified during their pre-sedation assessment, using evidence-based factors relating to patient characteristics, comorbidities, the nature of the procedure and the nature of the anticipated sedation technique. Graded fasting precautions for liquids and solids are then recommended for elective procedures based upon this categorisation of negligible, mild or moderate aspiration risk. This consensus statement can serve as a resource to practitioners and policymakers who perform and oversee procedural sedation in patients of all ages, worldwide.
More Related Videos
07:54Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
05:50Author Spotlight: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Gastric Content Assessment and Risk Stratification in Perioperative Care
Published on: September 22, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Stages of General Anesthesia
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...