Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026
Mechanical and Controlled PRP Injections in Patients Affected by Androgenetic Alopecia
Published on: January 27, 2018
Quality issues identified in systematic reviews on platelet-rich plasma therapy for pattern hair loss-A method study
Frank Peinemann1, Gezim Dervishi1
1Children's Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Background:
Systematic reviews of healthcare interventions aim to evaluate the quality of clinical studies, but they might have quality issues in their own right.
Objective:
We aimed to evaluate methodological inconsistencies in systematic reviews.
Methods:
We searched the database MEDLINE and included systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses on platelet-rich plasma therapy for pattern hair loss.
Results:
We identified 15 relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses, and we identified various overt methodological inconsistencies in five of those systematic reviews. These inconsistencies concerned including duplicate data, mixing data from various study designs, misclassifying study designs and treatment comparisons, misinterpreting heterogeneity, and mistaking reporting standards.
Conclusion:
The identification of various inconsistencies in previous systematic reviews on platelet-rich plasma therapy for pattern hair loss should prompt future authors to consult the Cochrane Handbook and to implement the PRISMA statement.
