Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.6K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.6K
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting01:18

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

2.6K
The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
2.6K
Data Reporting and Recording01:24

Data Reporting and Recording

5.3K
Reporting and recording are crucial in data documentation. The timely, thorough, and accurate documentation of facts is essential when recording patient data. Failure to record findings during an assessment or interpretation of a problem will result in loss of information and make the patient document unreliable. The reader is left with general impressions if the information is not specific. A recording is documenting data of the individual's health information in a traceable, secure, and...
5.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the psychosocial impacts of e-care use among older people receiving long-term care in Slovenia through the adapted PIADS-10 scale.

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology·2025
Same author

Evidence and User Considerations of Home Health Monitoring for Older Adults: Scoping Review.

JMIR aging·2022
Same author

Multilevel barriers to using assistive technology devices among older hispanics from poor and disadvantaged communities: the relevance of a gender analysis.

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology·2022
Same author

The role of assistive technology in addressing social isolation, loneliness and health inequities among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology·2022
Same author

Development of the Home Fall Hazard Checklist.

Rehabilitation research and practice·2021
Same author

Older adults' use of an online decision support system: Usability and stability of assistive technology recommendations.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.2K

Toward guidelines for reporting assistive technology device outcomes.

Joshua R Tuazon1, Jeffrey W Jutai2

  • 1Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology
|December 5, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study developed reliable reporting guidelines for assistive technology device outcomes research. The checklist demonstrated excellent interrater agreement, aiming to enhance research quality and advance the field.

Keywords:
Reporting guidelinesassistive deviceframeworkoutcomerehabilitation

More Related Videos

Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy
13:44

Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy

Published on: August 8, 2011

14.5K
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

58.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.2K
Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy
13:44

Haptic/Graphic Rehabilitation: Integrating a Robot into a Virtual Environment Library and Applying it to Stroke Therapy

Published on: August 8, 2011

14.5K
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

58.6K

Area of Science:

  • Rehabilitation Research
  • Assistive Technology Outcomes
  • Scientific Reporting Standards

Background:

  • High-quality research is crucial for effective assistive technology (AT) device development and implementation.
  • Existing research on AT device outcomes may lack standardized reporting, hindering comparability and progress.
  • Developing clear reporting guidelines is essential to improve the quality of AT outcomes research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and pilot-test reporting guidelines for manuscripts on assistive technology device outcomes.
  • To enhance the overall quality and consistency of research in the field of assistive technology.
  • To provide a framework for researchers and editors to improve clarity and completeness in reporting AT studies.

Main Methods:

  • A two-stage research process was employed, starting with a literature review to establish a conceptual framework and create a checklist.
  • The developed checklist was pilot-tested by two independent reviewers on twenty articles.
  • Interrater reliability was assessed, and the checklist was revised based on reviewer feedback and disagreements.

Main Results:

  • The reporting checklist demonstrated excellent interrater agreement, with a Cohen's Kappa value of 0.887 (p < .000).
  • Overall percent agreement among reviewers was high, reaching 94.6%.
  • The pilot testing identified areas for improvement, leading to the revision of two checklist items.

Conclusions:

  • The developed reporting guidelines for assistive technology device outcomes research are reliable.
  • The checklist has the potential to advance outcomes research by establishing a minimum standard for reporting quality.
  • Researchers and journal editors are encouraged to adopt these guidelines to improve the clarity and completeness of published studies.