Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

307
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
307
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantifying uncertainty in drift diffusion models of decision making under temporal dependence and parameter variability.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Water restriction still has a place.

Lab animal·2024
Same author

Is N-Hacking Ever OK? The consequences of collecting more data in pursuit of statistical significance.

PLoS biology·2023
Same author

Different Forms of Variability Could Explain a Difference Between Human and Rat Decision Making.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2022
Same author

Rational regulation of water-seeking effort in rodents.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021
Same author

Training Rats Using Water Rewards Without Water Restriction.

Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience·2018
Same journal

Relationship between spontaneous EEG oscillations at 7 and 45 days of acute plateau exposure and the plateau acclimatization index.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Neuroprotective effects of paederoside against mitochondrial dysfunction in rotenone-induced cell models of Parkinson's disease.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Covariance-based analysis of spindle-band EEG during declarative and non-declarative odor cueing in sleep.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Correction: Physiological determinants of cortical P100 responses in pattern visual evoked potentials: a scoping review.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor overflow: a systematic review in neurological disorders.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Advancing neurodegenerative disease biomarkers: the role of neuroimaging in TDP-43 and tau proteinopathies.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K

The Interaction Between Elapsed Time and Decision Accuracy Differs Between Humans and Rats.

Carly A Shevinsky1, Pamela Reinagel1

  • 1Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|December 6, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Rats and humans show opposite reaction time effects in visual motion discrimination tasks. While rat accuracy increases with reaction time, human accuracy decreases, challenging current decision-making models.

Keywords:
diffusion to bound (DTB)drift diffusion model (DDM)perceptual decision makingrandom dot motionrodent visionspeed accuracy trade off

More Related Videos

The Rodent Psychomotor Vigilance Test rPVT: A Method for Assessing Neurobehavioral Performance in Rats and Mice
07:47

The Rodent Psychomotor Vigilance Test rPVT: A Method for Assessing Neurobehavioral Performance in Rats and Mice

Published on: December 29, 2016

12.7K
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K
The Rodent Psychomotor Vigilance Test rPVT: A Method for Assessing Neurobehavioral Performance in Rats and Mice
07:47

The Rodent Psychomotor Vigilance Test rPVT: A Method for Assessing Neurobehavioral Performance in Rats and Mice

Published on: December 29, 2016

12.7K
Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

14.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Animal Behavior

Background:

  • Stochastic visual motion discrimination tasks are standard for studying rapid decision-making.
  • The drift-diffusion model predicts similar reaction times for correct and incorrect responses, a finding challenged by species-specific variations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate species-specific differences in decision-making by comparing human and rat performance on the same visual motion task.
  • To refine mathematical models of decision-making by providing new empirical constraints.

Main Methods:

  • Humans and rats performed an identical stochastic visual motion discrimination task.
  • Data were analyzed using a novel temporally local analysis method to account for non-stationarity.
  • Performance was assessed across varying levels of motion coherence.

Main Results:

  • Rats exhibited increased accuracy with longer reaction times.
  • Humans showed decreased accuracy with longer reaction times, consistent with previous findings.
  • These opposing trends were robust across different task structures and signal strengths.

Conclusions:

  • The study confirms divergent decision-making strategies between rats and humans.
  • Findings necessitate revisions to existing drift-diffusion models and other decision-making theories.
  • Identical task paradigms are crucial for cross-species comparisons in neuroscience.