Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

362
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
362
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

16.6K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.6K
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior01:29

Social Psychology and Individual Behavior

231
Social psychology examines how group dynamics, emotions, and cultural influences shape individual actions and decision-making. These elements interact to form behavioral patterns that affect personal choices and social interactions.The Role of Group DynamicsGroups play a crucial role in shaping behavior by reinforcing norms and expectations. Individuals derive a sense of self from group membership, often aligning their behaviors with group norms to maintain social cohesion. For example, an...
231
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.4K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.4K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

838
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
838

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social learning dynamically shapes moral decision-making by biasing subjective valuation.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Oxytocin modulates the neurocomputational mechanisms engaged in learning rank relationships in social networks.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Learning to adaptively cooperate through social interactions during childhood and adolescence.

NPJ science of learning·2026
Same author

Intention-Outcome Trade-Off in Moral Character Learning.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same author

Neurocomputational mechanisms of adaptive mentalization in humans.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Culturally-attuned AI: Implicit learning of altruistic cultural values through inverse reinforcement learning.

PloS one·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K

Modeling other minds: Bayesian inference explains human choices in group decision-making.

Koosha Khalvati1, Seongmin A Park2,3, Saghar Mirbagheri4

  • 1Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Science Advances
|December 7, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans predict group behavior using Bayesian inference, modeling the "mind of the group" in large, anonymous social settings. This approach enhances predictions of others' actions and self-impact on group dynamics.

More Related Videos

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.3K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • Social decision-making requires predicting others' behavior, often relying on 'theory of mind'.
  • Predicting behavior becomes complex in large, anonymous groups.
  • Existing models struggle to capture human behavior in such scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a predictive model for human behavior in large, anonymous group decision-making.
  • To investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying group interaction predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the volunteer's dilemma, a group decision-making task.
  • Developed a Bayesian model based on partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs).
  • Compared the POMDP model's predictions against existing models and empirical human behavior.

Main Results:

  • The proposed Bayesian POMDP model significantly outperformed existing models in quantitatively predicting human behavior.
  • The model accurately predicted outcomes of group interactions in the volunteer's dilemma.
  • Demonstrated that humans employ Bayesian inference to model group dynamics.

Conclusions:

  • Humans appear to use Bayesian inference to model the 'mind of the group' in large, anonymous social contexts.
  • This cognitive strategy involves predicting others' decisions and simulating the impact of one's own actions.
  • The findings offer a novel computational framework for understanding complex social decision-making.