Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

1.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Active Lubrication Brakes in Tabletop and Hand-Held Haptic Surgical Drilling Simulators.

IEEE transactions on haptics·2026
Same author

Emotions in motion: How fear and anger differently influence forward single-step initiation.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness Modelling of Multiple System Atrophy for Early Health Technology Assessment.

PharmacoEconomics - open·2025
Same author

Combining deep learning and microfluidics for fast and noninvasive sorting of zebrafish embryo.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Haptic Microscopy: Tactile Perception of Small Scales.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

Revisiting tool use and distance perception: twenty years later.

Psychological research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
05:12

Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

Published on: September 18, 2017

548.3K

Pre-Calibrated Visuo-Haptic Co-Location Improves Execution in Virtual Environments.

Justine Saint-Aubert, Loic P Heurley, Nicolas Morgado

    IEEE Transactions on Haptics
    |December 14, 2019
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Visuo-haptic co-location in human-machine interfaces enhances user performance and preference. This study confirms co-location benefits, even with static calibration, for intuitive and efficient interaction.

    More Related Videos

    Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
    05:43

    Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

    Published on: May 23, 2019

    5.8K
    Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
    06:53

    Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

    Published on: March 1, 2017

    13.7K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

    Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
    05:12

    Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another

    Published on: September 18, 2017

    548.3K
    Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
    05:43

    Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

    Published on: May 23, 2019

    5.8K
    Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
    06:53

    Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

    Published on: March 1, 2017

    13.7K

    Area of Science:

    • Human-Computer Interaction
    • Robotics
    • Virtual Reality

    Background:

    • Visuo-haptic interfaces present design choices regarding force feedback placement.
    • Co-locating visual and force feedback enhances intuitiveness but increases implementation complexity.
    • The comparative benefits and challenges of co-located versus delocated visuo-haptic designs remain underexplored, especially for desktop interfaces.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the performance and user experience differences between co-located and delocated visuo-haptic configurations.
    • To evaluate the feasibility of static co-location without continuous head tracking for desktop interfaces.
    • To resolve ambiguities regarding user performance under different visuo-haptic feedback conditions.

    Main Methods:

    • A user-centered experiment was conducted with participants performing generic tasks in both co-located and delocated visuo-haptic setups.
    • Performance metrics included execution time, motion accuracy, and force variation.
    • Subjective user experience was gathered through surveys, and static co-location was tested to address implementation complexity.

    Main Results:

    • Co-located configurations resulted in significantly shorter execution times and more accurate user motions.
    • Participants demonstrated better force management and expressed a strong preference for co-located setups.
    • These benefits were observed even when co-location was achieved through static, pre-calibrated configurations.

    Conclusions:

    • Visuo-haptic co-location demonstrably improves task performance and user satisfaction in human-machine interfaces.
    • Static co-location offers a practical and effective solution for achieving these benefits in desktop environments, mitigating complex implementation requirements.
    • The findings support the adoption of co-located visuo-haptic designs for more intuitive and efficient human-machine interaction.