Chemotaxis and Direction of Cell Migration
Cell Migration
Cell Migration
Cytoskeletal Coordination in Cell Migration
Cell Polarization by Rho Proteins
Cancer Cell Migration through Invadopodia
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Ex Utero Electroporation and Organotypic Slice Cultures of Embryonic Mouse Brains for Live-Imaging of Migrating GABAergic Interneurons
Published on: April 20, 2018
Xiaoguang Li1, Yuchuan Miao1, Dhiman Sankar Pal2
1Department of Cell Biology and Center for Cell Dynamics, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
This study explores how cells move during development and disease by examining signal transduction networks. These networks, composed of molecules like Ras, PI3K, TorC2, and phosphoinositides, self-organize on the cell membrane and generate waves that drive protrusion formation. By perturbing these networks, researchers observed sudden changes in migration patterns. The findings suggest that excitable networks are crucial for controlling cell movement and may explain morphological changes in both normal development and disease states.
Area of Science:
Background:
Cell migration is essential for shaping tissues during development and for wound healing in adults. Prior research has shown that cells use various protrusions to move, but the underlying regulatory mechanisms remain unclear. Established knowledge includes the roles of cytoskeletal structures like lamellipods and filopods. However, the precise control of protrusion formation and migration modes is not fully understood. Recent studies suggest that excitable signal transduction networks may regulate these processes. This gap motivated researchers to explore how these networks influence cell movement. No prior work had resolved the specific components of these excitable networks. This paper contributes by identifying key signaling molecules involved in protrusion control. The findings may help explain both normal development and disease-related migration changes.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this research is to investigate how excitable signal transduction networks regulate cell migration. The specific problem is understanding how cells switch between different protrusion types during movement. The motivation comes from the need to connect cytoskeletal dynamics with signaling pathways. By identifying network components, the study seeks to clarify migration control. The researchers propose that Ras, PI3K, TorC2, and phosphoinositides form an excitable network. This network may explain transitions between protrusion types. The study also aims to link these mechanisms to developmental and disease contexts. Understanding these processes could improve models of tissue formation and cancer progression.
Main Methods:
The researchers used a combination of biochemical assays and live-cell imaging to study protrusion dynamics. They focused on Ras, PI3K, TorC2, and phosphoinositides as key network components. By perturbing specific points in the network, they observed changes in protrusion types. The study analyzed how these perturbations affect migration modes. They also examined the spatial and temporal propagation of signaling waves. Computational modeling was used to simulate network behavior. The approach included tracking protrusion transitions in real time. This allowed the team to map the relationship between signaling and movement patterns.
Main Results:
The strongest finding is that excitable networks control protrusion formation and migration modes. Ras, PI3K, TorC2, and phosphoinositides self-organize on the plasma membrane. These components propagate in waves that drive protrusion extension. Perturbing the network leads to abrupt shifts between protrusion types. For example, cells transitioned from pseudopods to filopods or lamellipods. The network includes both positive and negative feedback loops. Positive feedback accelerates protrusion formation, while negative feedback stabilizes it. These findings suggest that excitable networks are central to cell migration control.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that excitable signal transduction networks regulate cell migration through self-organized signaling waves. These waves determine protrusion types and migration modes. The network includes Ras, PI3K, TorC2, and phosphoinositides. Perturbations at specific points cause abrupt changes in protrusion behavior. The network contains oncogenes and tumor suppressors, suggesting disease relevance. This framework helps explain morphological changes in development. The findings may also inform cancer research by linking migration to signaling networks. The study supports the idea that excitable networks are critical for both normal and pathological cell movement.
The study suggests that excitable signal transduction networks, including Ras, PI3K, TorC2, and phosphoinositides, regulate cell migration through self-organized signaling waves.
The researchers identified Ras, PI3K, TorC2, and phosphoinositides as key components of the excitable network controlling protrusion formation.
The plasma membrane is where Ras, PI3K, TorC2, and phosphoinositides self-organize and propagate in waves to drive protrusion formation.
Signaling waves propagate across the plasma membrane, driving various protrusion types like pseudopods, filopods, and lamellipods.
Perturbations at specific points in the network cause abrupt shifts in protrusion types, such as transitions from pseudopods to filopods.
The authors propose that excitable networks help explain both normal developmental processes and disease-related changes in cell migration.