Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Developing Low-Tech Balance Assessment Methods for Broad-Spectrum Healthcare Applications
Published on: September 1, 2023
Test Order Does Not Affect Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening Item Scores in High School Athletes
Nathan R D'Amico1, R J Elbin1, Alicia Sufrinko2
1Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation/Office for Sport Concussion Research, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.
Objective:
To compare VOMS item scores between a fixed and randomized administration order in a sample of nonconcussed high school athletes.
Design:
Post-test only, quasi-experimental design.
Setting:
Local high schools in a mid-west region of the United States.
Patients:
Fifty nonconcussed high school athletes (M = 15.64; SD = 1.12 years) completed the VOMS in a randomized testing order (RANDOM), and 49 (M = 15.64; SD = 1.12 years) completed the VOMS in the fixed testing order (FIXED). The groups were matched on age, sex, learning disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, concussion history, and baseline concussion symptoms.
Interventions:
The Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) tool comprises pretest symptoms, smooth pursuit (SP), horizontal/vertical saccade (HSAC/VSAC), average near-point of convergence (NPC) distance, convergence symptoms, horizontal/vertical vestibular ocular reflex (HVOR/VVOR), and visual motion sensitivity (VMS).
Main Outcome Measures:
Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to examine differences between FIXED and RANDOM groups on VOMS items. RANDOM scores were rearranged in order of administration and combined with the FIXED group scores, and a Freidman test was performed for repeated measures.
Results:
There were no significant differences between FIXED and RANDOM groups on VOMS pretest symptoms (U = 1171, P = 0.57), SP (U = 1122.5, P = 0.35), HSAC (U = 1128.5, P = 0.44), VSAC (U = 1055.5, P = 0.16), convergence symptoms (U = 1129.0, P = 0.41), average NPC distance (U = 979.0, P = 0.06), HVOR (U = 1085.0, P = 0.25), VVOR (U = 1126.0, P = 0.41), and VMS scores (U = 1101.0, P = 0.32). When VOMS items were rearranged and the sample was combined, there were no differences for repeated measures [χ2 (6) = 9.92, P = 0.13].
Conclusions:
There were no significant differences on VOMS items between FIXED and RANDOM groups for repeated measures. The testing order of VOMS items does not affect VOMS scores in nonconcussed high school athletes.
More Related Videos
07:24Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
Published on: August 22, 2025
10:12Three Dimensional Vestibular Ocular Reflex Testing Using a Six Degrees of Freedom Motion Platform
Published on: May 23, 2013