Influence of Expected Reward on Temporal Order Judgment
Mohsen Rakhshan1, Vivian Lee1, Emily Chu1
1Dartmouth College.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|December 19, 2019
Summary
Reward influences decision-making by altering later stages, not sensory input. This study on perceptual decision-making shows reward bias is independent of sensory sensitivity, suggesting heuristic modulation.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Neuroeconomics
- Computational Neuroscience
Background:
- Perceptual decision-making is influenced by expected rewards from alternative choices.
- The neural basis of reward's influence on decision-making remains unclear, with debate on whether it affects sensory or decision stages.
- Understanding this mechanism is crucial for explaining goal-directed behavior.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether reward influences perceptual decision-making by modulating sensory processing or later decision-making stages.
- To differentiate between perceptual bias and response bias in the context of reward modulation.
- To explore potential neural mechanisms underlying reward's influence on decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments with human participants performing a temporal judgment task involving saccades to visual targets.
- Manipulation of expected reward for correct and incorrect responses on a trial-by-trial basis.
- Comparison of reward-induced biases across experiments and simulation using a cortical network model.
Main Results:
- Similar reward biases were observed in both experiments, indicating reward primarily influences later decision-making stages.
- Reward-induced biases were independent of individual sensory sensitivity.
- Cortical network model simulations supported reward-dependent input to the output layer of the decision circuit.
Conclusions:
- Reward primarily modulates later stages of decision-making (response bias) rather than early sensory processing (perceptual bias) in temporal judgment tasks.
- Reward effects appear to be heuristic, modulating decision processes rather than altering sensory perception.
- Findings suggest a neural mechanism where reward influences the output layer of the decision circuit.
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
301
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
301
Framing Effects
7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K
Reinforcement Schedules
403
Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...
Once a behavior is learned,...
403
First Impression
150
First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
150
Serial Position Effect
465
The serial position effect is a cognitive phenomenon where individuals are more likely to recall the first and last items in a list compared to those in the middle. This effect is divided into the primacy effect and the recency effect. The primacy effect is observed when the initial items in a list are remembered better. This occurs because these items are rehearsed more frequently or receive more elaborative processing, allowing them to be encoded into long-term memory more effectively. For...
465
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.7K


