Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

RNA Editing02:23

RNA Editing

9.7K
RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification where a precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) nucleotide sequence is changed by base insertion, deletion, or modification. The extent of RNA editing varies from a few hundred bases, in mitochondrial DNA of trypanosomes, to a just single base, in nuclear genes of mammals. Even a single base change in the pre-mRNA can convert a codon for one amino acid into the codon for another amino acid or a stop codon. This type of re-coding can significantly affect the...
9.7K
Transfer RNA Synthesis02:36

Transfer RNA Synthesis

13.0K
One of the unique features of tRNA is the presence of modified bases. In some tRNAs, modified bases account for nearly 20% of the total bases in the molecule. Altogether, these unusual bases protect the tRNA from enzymatic degradation by RNases.
Each of these chemical modifications is carried by a specific enzyme, post-transcription. All of these enzymes have unique base and site-specificity. Methylation, the most common chemical modification, is carried by at least nine different enzymes, with...
13.0K
RNA Stability01:53

RNA Stability

35.5K
Intact DNA strands can be found in fossils, while scientists sometimes struggle to keep RNA intact under laboratory conditions. The structural variations between RNA and DNA underlie the differences in their stability and longevity. Because DNA is double-stranded, it is inherently more stable. The single-stranded structure of RNA is less stable but also more flexible and can form weak internal bonds. Additionally, most RNAs in the cell are relatively short, while DNA can be up to 250 million...
35.5K
Pre-mRNA Processing: Modification of pre-mRNA Ends01:35

Pre-mRNA Processing: Modification of pre-mRNA Ends

13.4K
In eukaryotic cells, transcripts made by RNA polymerase are modified and processed before exiting the nucleus. Unprocessed RNA is called precursor mRNA or pre-mRNA to distinguish it from mature mRNA.
Once about 20-40 ribonucleotides have been joined together by RNA polymerase, a group of enzymes adds a cap to the 5' end of the growing transcript. In this process, a 5' phosphate is replaced by modified guanosine that has a methyl group attached (7-methyl guanosine). This 5' cap helps...
13.4K
pre-mRNA Processing02:01

pre-mRNA Processing

56.8K
In eukaryotic cells, transcripts made by RNA polymerase are modified and processed before exiting the nucleus. Unprocessed RNA is called precursor mRNA or pre-mRNA to distinguish it from mature mRNA.
Once about 20-40 ribonucleotides have been joined together by RNA polymerase, a group of enzymes adds a “cap” to the 5’ end of the growing transcript. In this process, a 5’ phosphate is replaced by modified guanosine that has a methyl group attached to it (7-Methyl...
56.8K
RNA-seq03:21

RNA-seq

11.6K
RNA sequencing, or RNA-Seq, is a high-throughput sequencing technology used to study the transcriptome of a cell. Transcriptomics helps to interpret the functional elements of a genome and identify the molecular constituents of an organism. Additionally, it also helps in understanding the development of an organism and the occurrence of diseases. 
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while...
11.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prediction of Dangerous Driving Behavior Based on Vehicle Motion State and Passenger Feeling Using Cloud Model and Elman Neural Network.

Frontiers in neurorobotics·2021
Same author

iGlu_AdaBoost: Identification of Lysine Glutarylation Using the AdaBoost Classifier.

Journal of proteome research·2020
Same author

Prediction of m5C Modifications in RNA Sequences by Combining Multiple Sequence Features.

Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids·2020
Same author

A Computational Method for the Identification of Endolysins and Autolysins.

Protein and peptide letters·2019
Same author

CLIC4 abrogation promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer.

Carcinogenesis·2019
Same author

A Novel Small Molecule Targets Androgen Receptor and Its Splice Variants in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Molecular cancer therapeutics·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

2D-HELS MS Seq: A General LC-MS-Based Method for Direct and de novo Sequencing of RNA Mixtures with Different Nucleotide Modifications
05:41

2D-HELS MS Seq: A General LC-MS-Based Method for Direct and de novo Sequencing of RNA Mixtures with Different Nucleotide Modifications

Published on: July 10, 2020

2.2K

Is There Any Sequence Feature in the RNA Pseudouridine Modification Prediction Problem?

Lijun Dou1, Xiaoling Li2, Hui Ding3

  • 1School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen Polytechnic, Shenzhen, China; Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids
|December 23, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Computational methods are needed to detect pseudouridine (Ψ) sites in RNA sequences. This study evaluated existing methods and combined features, but overall accuracy for Ψ site prediction remains a challenge.

Keywords:
bi-profile Bayesmax-relevance-max-distance methodpseudouridine siterandom forestsupport vector machine

More Related Videos

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.9K
An In Vitro Assay to Detect tRNA-Isopentenyl Transferase Activity
07:46

An In Vitro Assay to Detect tRNA-Isopentenyl Transferase Activity

Published on: October 8, 2018

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

2D-HELS MS Seq: A General LC-MS-Based Method for Direct and de novo Sequencing of RNA Mixtures with Different Nucleotide Modifications
05:41

2D-HELS MS Seq: A General LC-MS-Based Method for Direct and de novo Sequencing of RNA Mixtures with Different Nucleotide Modifications

Published on: July 10, 2020

2.2K
A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing
08:50

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

Published on: April 21, 2022

2.9K
An In Vitro Assay to Detect tRNA-Isopentenyl Transferase Activity
07:46

An In Vitro Assay to Detect tRNA-Isopentenyl Transferase Activity

Published on: October 8, 2018

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Pseudouridine (Ψ) is the most abundant RNA modification, crucial for basic research and drug development.
  • Experimental identification of Ψ sites is costly and time-consuming, necessitating accurate computational methods.
  • Existing computational predictors for Ψ sites often yield unsatisfactory performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify Ψ sites in H. sapiens, S. cerevisiae, and M. musculus using bi-profile Bayes (BPB) with Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithms.
  • To evaluate the performance of combined sequence features (Kmer, PC-PseDNC-General, NCP, ND) with BPB for improved Ψ site prediction.
  • To assess the effectiveness of feature selection using the max-relevance-max-distance (MRMD) method.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized bi-profile Bayes (BPB) method with RF and SVM algorithms for Ψ site identification.
  • Employed 5-fold cross-validation and independent tests for performance evaluation.
  • Combined basic Kmer, PC-PseDNC-General, and iRNA-PseU (NCP, ND) features, with MRMD for feature selection.

Main Results:

  • SVM-based accuracy was lower than iPseU-CUU for H. sapiens and S. cerevisiae datasets, but showed improvement for M. musculus and an independent S. cerevisiae dataset.
  • Combined features achieved improved accuracies for S. cerevisiae (up to 77%) and M. musculus (up to 72.45%), outperforming iPseU-CUU.
  • No significant improvement was observed for H. sapiens, with accuracies around 63.23%-72.0%.

Conclusions:

  • The study highlights limitations in current computational methods for Ψ site prediction, with accuracies generally ranging from 60%-70%.
  • Further research is needed to explore novel sequence features for more accurate RNA pseudouridine modification prediction.
  • The findings suggest a need to reconsider the sequence-based features employed in existing Ψ site prediction models.