Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

6.8K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.8K
Synteny and Evolution02:31

Synteny and Evolution

3.7K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reduced social prioritization: An underlying mechanism driving slower latency to look at faces in autism.

Journal of psychopathology and clinical science·2025
Same author

Social Anxiety Reduces Visual Attention to the Eyes of Emotional Faces in Autistic Youth.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2024
Same author

How is race perceived during adolescence? A meta-analysis of the own-race bias.

Developmental psychology·2024
Same author

Autistic Individuals Do Not Alter Visual Processing Strategy During Encoding Versus Recognition of Faces: A Hidden Markov Modeling Approach.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2024
Same author

A multilevel Bayesian meta-analysis of the body inversion effect: Evaluating controversies over headless and sexualized bodies.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022
Same author

The Episodic Memory Profile in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Bayesian Meta-Analysis.

Neuropsychology review·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face
08:15

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.3K

Quantifying the face inversion effect in nonhuman primates: a phylogenetic meta-analysis.

Jason W Griffin1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, 423 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. jxg569@psu.edu.

Animal Cognition
|December 25, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The face inversion effect, crucial for human face recognition, was examined in nonhuman primates. A meta-analysis found no significant evidence for this effect in monkeys or chimpanzees, suggesting different face processing strategies.

Keywords:
ChimpanzeeComparativeFace perceptionFace processingMonkey

More Related Videos

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

9.8K
Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face
08:15

Reverse Dissection and DiceCT Reveal Otherwise Hidden Data in the Evolution of the Primate Face

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.3K
Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

9.8K
Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus
09:26

Quantification of Orofacial Phenotypes in Xenopus

Published on: November 6, 2014

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Primatology
  • Evolutionary Psychology

Background:

  • Face recognition is vital for primate social cognition.
  • Humans exhibit specialized face processing, including sensitivity to upright faces, known as the face inversion effect.
  • Previous studies on this effect in nonhuman primates yielded inconsistent results, particularly in monkeys.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively assess the face inversion effect in nonhuman primates using a meta-analytic approach.
  • To investigate potential variations in the face inversion effect based on species (chimpanzee vs. monkey) and stimulus type (conspecific vs. heterospecific faces).

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a multilevel, phylogenetic meta-analysis.
  • Synthesized data from 52 effect sizes across 16 independent studies.
  • Analyzed the difference in inversion costs for faces versus non-face stimuli.

Main Results:

  • The overall difference in inversion costs between faces and non-face stimuli was small and not statistically significant (p=0.06).
  • No systematic variation in the face inversion effect was observed between chimpanzees and monkeys, or between conspecific and heterospecific face stimuli.
  • The face inversion effect was not found to be a reliable phenomenon in the studied nonhuman primate groups.

Conclusions:

  • The face inversion effect is not reliably demonstrated in nonhuman primates, including chimpanzees and monkeys.
  • Nonhuman primates may not employ the same face-specific processing strategies observed in humans.
  • Further research is needed to understand the nuances of face recognition across primate species.