Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
Print exposure explains individual differences in using syntactic but not semantic cues for pronoun comprehension
Valerie J Langlois1, Jennifer E Arnold1
1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States of America.
Abstract:
Comprehenders have been shown to use both syntactic and semantic cues to understand pronouns like he and she. In Ana threw the ball to Liz. She…, there is a syntactic bias to assign "she" to the previous subject (Ana), and a semantic bias to assign it to the goal referent (Liz). How do people learn these biases? We tested how sensitivity to these cues is modulated by linguistic experience, measured with an Author Recognition Task (Stanovich & West, 1989). In two experiments, we found both the subject and goal biases overall, but higher print exposure only predicted use of the subject bias, not the goal bias. Our results suggest that the subject bias, and not the goal bias, may be learned from exposure.
More Related Videos
05:38Interaction between Phonological and Semantic Processes in Visual Word Recognition using Electrophysiology
Published on: June 29, 2021
08:17A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published on: April 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Non-Verbal Cues
Fundamental Attribution Error