Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

EPS and iPS Cells in Disease Research01:21

EPS and iPS Cells in Disease Research

3.3K
Embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells are excellent models for disease research because of their ability to self-renew and differentiate into most cell types. Somatic cells from a patient are isolated and reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cells or iPSCs. These iPSCs are later differentiated into the desired cell type, which mirrors the diseased cell of the patient. In this way, disease models have been created for investigating diseases such as Down syndrome, type I diabetes,...
3.3K
iPS Cell Differentiation01:22

iPS Cell Differentiation

3.0K
The ability of induced pluripotent stem cells or iPSCs to differentiate into most body cell types has stimulated repair and regenerative medicine research over the past few decades. iPSC-derived blood cells, hepatocytes, beta islet cells, cardiomyocytes, neurons, and other cell types can repair injuries or regenerate damaged tissue in diseases such as diabetes and neurodegenerative disorders.
3.0K
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells01:06

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

5.2K
Stem cells are undifferentiated cells that divide and produce different cell types. Ordinarily, cells that have differentiated into a specific cell type are terminally differentiated; however, scientists have found a way to reprogram these mature cells so that they dedifferentiate and return to an unspecialized, proliferative state. These cells are pluripotent like embryonic stem cells—able to produce all cell types—and are called induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).
Somatic...
5.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Targeting ferroptosis induction via nanomaterials in hepatocellular carcinoma: an insight into mechanism and therapeutic potential.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2026
Same author

Prevalence and Epidemiological Characteristics of <i>Mycoplasma synoviae</i> Infection in Chickens in Mainland China.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026
Same author

β-TrCP targets nucleolin and modulates phase separation to restrict ribosome biogenesis in myocardial infarction hearts.

Cellular signalling·2026
Same author

Next-generation biomedical nanorobots: active design, intelligent control, and translational opportunities in regenerative and minimally invasive medicine.

Journal of nanobiotechnology·2026
Same author

Bilateral Myeloid Sarcoma of Breast: A Case Report and Discussion.

European journal of breast health·2026
Same author

Melatonin in Livestock Production: Bridging Chronobiology, Health, and Sustainable Outcomes.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same journal

Another 10 years of PLOS Computational Biology: A data-driven reflection on trends in genomics research.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Mobility data resolution needed to inform predictive models of spatial epidemic spread from mobile phone data.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

DeepMethylation: A deep learning framework for tissue-specific DNA methylation prediction and functional variant annotation.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Redefining and estimating the early-phase reproduction ratio for epidemic outbreaks in spatially structured populations.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Optimized phenotype definitions boost GWAS power.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same journal

Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales.

PLoS computational biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing PSC-to-Functional Cell Differentiation Using ML Models Based on Live-Cell Bright-Field Imaging
11:38

Author Spotlight: Enhancing PSC-to-Functional Cell Differentiation Using ML Models Based on Live-Cell Bright-Field Imaging

Published on: October 4, 2024

1.0K

A novel machine learning based approach for iPS progenitor cell identification.

Haishan Zhang1,2, Ximing Shao3, Yin Peng4

  • 1Joint Engineering Research Center for Health Big Data Intelligent Analysis Technology, Center for High Performance Computing, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Plos Computational Biology
|December 27, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed a machine learning method to identify induced pluripotent stem (iPS) progenitor cells early in reprogramming. This computational approach analyzes cell morphology and motion from live-cell imaging, overcoming limitations of traditional experimental methods for these rare cells.

More Related Videos

Generation of Mice Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
11:56

Generation of Mice Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Published on: November 29, 2012

22.1K
Generation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Peripheral Blood Using the STEMCCA Lentiviral Vector
12:03

Generation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Peripheral Blood Using the STEMCCA Lentiviral Vector

Published on: October 31, 2012

27.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing PSC-to-Functional Cell Differentiation Using ML Models Based on Live-Cell Bright-Field Imaging
11:38

Author Spotlight: Enhancing PSC-to-Functional Cell Differentiation Using ML Models Based on Live-Cell Bright-Field Imaging

Published on: October 4, 2024

1.0K
Generation of Mice Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
11:56

Generation of Mice Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Published on: November 29, 2012

22.1K
Generation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Peripheral Blood Using the STEMCCA Lentiviral Vector
12:03

Generation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Peripheral Blood Using the STEMCCA Lentiviral Vector

Published on: October 31, 2012

27.3K

Area of Science:

  • Stem cell biology
  • Computational biology
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Identifying induced pluripotent stem (iPS) progenitor cells is crucial for understanding reprogramming mechanisms.
  • Early progenitor cells are rare (<5%) and lack known biomarkers, making experimental identification challenging.
  • Current methods can only identify iPS cells around day 6, missing early progenitor dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel computational approach for identifying iPS progenitor cells during the early stages of reprogramming.
  • To overcome the limitations of experimental identification due to low cell ratios and lack of biomarkers.
  • To analyze cell morphology and motion patterns for distinguishing progenitor cells from normal fibroblasts.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized live-cell imaging to record the reprogramming process of murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) after viral infection (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4).
  • Calculated 11 morphological and motion features from time-lapse microscopy images for cells 3-5 days post-infection.
  • Developed a machine learning model (XGBoost) using selected features and optimal time windows for prediction, handling missing data.

Main Results:

  • The XGBoost model achieved a minimum precision above 52% in identifying iPS progenitor cells within 3-5 days post-infection.
  • Feature selection identified six key morphological and motion features crucial for accurate prediction.
  • The model demonstrated robustness, applicable to datasets with missing values or frames.

Conclusions:

  • The developed computational method effectively identifies iPS progenitor cells using machine learning and image analysis.
  • Distinct morphology and motion patterns differentiate iPS progenitor cells from normal MEFs, enabling computational identification.
  • This approach provides valuable insights into early reprogramming dynamics and the origin of iPS cells.