Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 1, 2026

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
Multiscale response of the human skull to quasi-static compression
Stephen L Alexander1, C Allan Gunnarsson2, Karin Rafaels2
1SURVICE Engineering Company, 4695 Millennium Dr, Belcamp, MD, 21017, USA.
Abstract:
Full thickness skull specimens were extracted from the human crania, with both the inner and outer surfaces intact. The BVF-morphology (bone volume fraction) of these specimens had been previously characterized in detail and reported, with high-resolution micro-computed tomography at ~5 μm resolution. A subset of these specimens was loaded in the direction normal to the outer surface in quasi-static compression. In contrast to many previous mechanical characterization studies of skulls, following two additional procedures were used in this study. (1) Fresh skull specimens were used, which were stored refrigerated before mechanical loading, instead of using embalmed or dried specimens. (2) Furthermore, using digital image correlation, non-contact full-field inhomogeneous strain measurements were made using the speckled specimen surfaces and the compression platens, also avoiding possible errors in strain measurements from machine compliance and due to irregularities in the loading surfaces of the specimen. The averaged far-field compressive mechanical response was obtained from these local full-field measurements on the composite bone specimens. Assuming a layered structure for the skull bone, using the local averaged full-field strain measurements of each layer, a power law was used to represent the relationship between initial mechanical response and the averaged BVF of the layers. Using the measured porosity maps of the rest of the non-compressed specimens, this relationship was used to predict the modulus-depth dependency of the skull bone and the variabilities associated with the structure. The mechanical properties and density as a function of the normalized thickness of the skull are presented for use in finite element simulations to model the skull with the desired degrees of complexities, also based on the region of action, depending on the goals of the computer simulation of the impact: either as a single homogenous layer, three-layer sandwich, multilayer heterogeneous or continuous elemental structure. In addition, a power law was derived relating the compressive failure strength and bone volume fraction (BVF) for the skull bone.
More Related Videos
07:30A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
07:09In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Overview of the Skull
The cranial vault surrounds and protects the brain and houses the middle and inner ear structures. This cavity is bounded superiorly by the rounded top of the skull, which...
Sutures of the Skull
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
Behavior of Concrete Under Compressive Load
As the concrete specimen fractures under...
Generalized Hooke's Law
Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity