Quantitative implications of the updated EARL 2019 PET-CT performance standards
Andres Kaalep1, Coreline N Burggraaff2, Simone Pieplenbosch3
1Department of Medical Technology, North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, J. Sutiste Str 19, Tallinn, 13419, Republic of Estonia. kaalep@gmail.com.
New European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd (EARL) 2 standards impact PET-CT quantitative reads. Applying Gaussian filtering to EARL2 images successfully generated EARL1-compliant data, ensuring consistent quantitative metrics.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Medical Imaging
- Radiomics
Background:
- The European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd (EARL) provides standardized specifications for quantitative PET-CT imaging.
- Updated EARL specifications (EARL2) have been released, necessitating an evaluation of their impact on quantitative reads.
- Maintaining consistency with current EARL standards (EARL1) is crucial for clinical practice during the transition to new specifications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of the new EARL2 specifications on quantitative metrics derived from clinical PET-CT studies.
- To test a method for generating quantitative reads compliant with EARL1 standards using EARL2-reconstructed images.
Main Methods:
- Four PET-CT image datasets were created from 13 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 17 lymphoma studies: one EARL1 compliant, one EARL2 reconstructed, and two EARL2 reconstructed with 6 mm (EARL2F6) and 7 mm (EARL2F7) Gaussian post-filtering.
- Quantitative metrics including metabolic tumor volume (MATV), standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were compared across the datasets.
- Tumor-to-background ratios (tumor-to-liver and tumor-to-blood pool) and three volume of interest (VOI) methods (MAX41, A50P, SUV4) were also assessed in 55 lesions.
Main Results:
- The EARL2 specifications, particularly with the MAX41 VOI method, led to a 22% decrease in MATV, unchanged TLG, and a 23-30% increase in SUV values compared to EARL1.
- The EARL2F7 dataset (7 mm Gaussian filter) demonstrated the best alignment with EARL1 quantitative metrics, showing no significant differences for most metrics (p>0.05).
- While SUV metrics were consistent across different VOI methods, MATV and TLG showed variations. No significant differences were observed between NSCLC and lymphoma cohorts.
Conclusions:
- Adoption of EARL2 standards can alter quantitative PET-CT metrics, potentially increasing SUVs and reducing MATV while slightly changing TLG compared to EARL1.
- Applying Gaussian filtering (specifically 7 mm in this study) to EARL2-reconstructed PET images is an effective method to achieve quantitative reads compliant with EARL1 standards.
- This approach allows for the utilization of updated EARL2 protocols while ensuring continuity and comparability with existing EARL1-based quantitative data in clinical research.
More Related Videos
11:09High-Resolution Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Small Animals
Published on: December 16, 2022
08:02Author Spotlight: Enhanced Quantification of Cardiovascular Calcification Progression for Longitudinal Micro PET/CT Studies in Small Research Animals
Published on: November 15, 2024
