Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic control of dynamic brain network reconfiguration during working memory.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Graph theory analysis based on cross frequency coupling methods in major depressive disorder: A resting state EEG study.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025
Same author

Neuron-type-specific Contributions to Dynamic Coding during Flexible Sensorimotor Decisions in Frontoparietal Cortex.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2025
Same author

Microstate Dynamics in Working Memory: Exploring Spatial Information Coding of Stimulus and Behavioral Performance.

Brain and behavior·2025
Same author

Decoding muscle activity via CNN-LSTM from 3D spatiotemporal EEG.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2025
Same author

Advancing Spike Sorting Through Gradient-Based Preprocessing and Nonlinear Reduction With Agglomerative Clustering.

Brain and behavior·2025
Same journal

A comparison between EPSON V700 and EPSON V800 scanners for film dosimetry.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

Nanodosimetric understanding to the dependence of the relationship between dose-averaged lineal energy on nanoscale and LET on ion species.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

Schizophrenia diagnosis using innovative EEG feature-level fusion schemes.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

EPSM 2019, Engineering and Physical Sciences in Medicine : 28-30 October 2019, Perth, Australia.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

New name: Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2020
Same journal

Development of wearable posture monitoring system for dynamic assessment of sitting posture.

Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine·2019
See all related articles
  1. Home
  3. Force Decoding Using Local Field Potentials In Primary Motor Cortex: Pls Or Kalman Filter Regression?
  1. Home
  3. Force Decoding Using Local Field Potentials In Primary Motor Cortex: Pls Or Kalman Filter Regression?

Related Experiment Video

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice
07:03

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice

Published on: July 31, 2019

7.1K

Force decoding using local field potentials in primary motor cortex: PLS or Kalman filter regression?

Nargess Heydari Beni1,2, Reza Foodeh1, Vahid Shalchyan1

  • 1Neuroscience and Neuroengineering Research Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, 16846-13114, Tehran, Iran.

Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine
|January 4, 2020

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Partial Least Square (PLS) regression and Kalman filters can decode force parameters from brain signals for brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). PLS regression demonstrated superior performance and speed compared to the Kalman filter for this application.

Keywords:
Brain-computer interfaceLinear and nonlinear Kalman filtersLocal field potentialPartial least squareStationary wavelet transformWhitening transform

More Related Videos

Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
07:42

Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

Published on: August 17, 2018

12.4K
Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
08:50

Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: August 20, 2019

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice
07:03

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice

Published on: July 31, 2019

7.1K
Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
07:42

Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

Published on: August 17, 2018

12.4K
Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
08:50

Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Published on: August 20, 2019

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are crucial for controlling external devices.
  • Decoding complex movement parameters from neural signals is essential for advanced BCI applications.
  • Local Field Potential (LFP) signals from the primary motor cortex (M1) contain movement-related information.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of Partial Least Square (PLS) regression and Kalman filters in predicting force parameters from rat M1 LFP signals.
  • To evaluate the performance and computational efficiency of these decoding methods.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded 16-channel LFP signals from the M1 of rats performing a force-generating behavioral task.
  • Applied PLS regression and Kalman filter algorithms to decode the force parameter from the recorded LFPs.
  • Assessed decoding performance using correlation coefficient (CC) and normalized mean square error (NMSE).

    • Main Results:

    • Both PLS regression (CC=0.75, NMSE=0.37) and Kalman filters (CC=0.72, NMSE=0.48) effectively decoded force parameters.
    • PLS regression outperformed the Kalman filter in both predictive accuracy and computational speed.
    • Nonlinear Kalman filters showed similar CC performance to PLS but incurred higher computational costs.

    Conclusions:

    • PLS regression is a highly effective and efficient linear method for decoding force parameters from M1 LFPs for BCI applications.
    • Linear methods like PLS can be superior to more complex nonlinear methods in terms of performance and speed for specific BCI tasks.
    • The findings suggest PLS regression is a promising technique for real-world BCI control requiring complex movement decoding.