Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Noninvasive Neurostimulation to the Inferior Frontal Sulcus or Cerebellum Improves Accuracy But Not Timing in a Speech Motor Learning Task.

Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

A comparison of structural morphometry in children and adults with persistent developmental stuttering.

Brain communications·2023
Same author

Do Not Cut Off Your Tail: A Mega-Analysis of Responses to Auditory Perturbation Experiments.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2023
Same author

Screen media exposure and young children's vocabulary learning and development: A meta-analysis.

Child development·2023
Same author

Human perception and machine vision reveal rich latent structure in human figure drawings.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

The effect of narrative coherence and visual salience on children's and adults' gaze while watching video.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
06:07

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

8.9K

Using eye-tracking to understand relations between visual attention and language in children's spatial skills.

Hilary E Miller1, Heather L Kirkorian2, Vanessa R Simmering3

  • 1University of Wisconsin-Madison and McPherson Eye Research Institute, United States; Waisman Center, United States; Emory University, United States.

Cognitive Psychology
|January 6, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Language cues significantly improve children's spatial recall beyond visual attention. This study explored how spatial language and visual cues impact young children's memory for object locations.

Keywords:
Child developmentEye-trackingLanguageReference frame selectionSpatial cognitionVisual attention

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.3K
Gaze in Action: Head-mounted Eye Tracking of Children's Dynamic Visual Attention During Naturalistic Behavior
07:09

Gaze in Action: Head-mounted Eye Tracking of Children's Dynamic Visual Attention During Naturalistic Behavior

Published on: November 14, 2018

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
06:07

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm

Published on: May 15, 2019

8.9K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.3K
Gaze in Action: Head-mounted Eye Tracking of Children's Dynamic Visual Attention During Naturalistic Behavior
07:09

Gaze in Action: Head-mounted Eye Tracking of Children's Dynamic Visual Attention During Naturalistic Behavior

Published on: November 14, 2018

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • The relationship between children's spatial language and spatial skills is debated, with mixed evidence on whether language effects are unique or non-linguistic.
  • Prior studies show language cues aid spatial performance more than visual cues, but non-verbal attention is a stronger predictor than language production.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the unique contributions of language and visual cues to spatial recall in young children.
  • To compare the effectiveness of language cues versus visual cues in supporting spatial memory using eye-tracking.

Main Methods:

  • Four- to five-year-old children participated in spatial recall tasks with varying cue conditions (language, visual, non-specific).
  • Eye-tracking technology was employed during a delayed spatial recall task involving array rotation to monitor visual attention.
  • Children completed a baseline task followed by a cue-manipulation task to assess cue effectiveness.

Main Results:

  • Language cues were the most effective in facilitating spatial recall compared to visual or non-specific cues.
  • Both language and visual cues directed children's visual attention, supporting recall.
  • Visual attention partially mediated the effect of language, indicating language has unique influences beyond attention direction.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial language offers unique benefits for spatial recall that extend beyond its role in directing visual attention.
  • Language may provide a more coherent or redundant coding of visual information, or pragmatically signal relevance.
  • Findings suggest language influences spatial cognition through both attentional and non-attentional mechanisms, offering insights into developmental processes.