Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

32.7K
Erwin Chargaff’s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff’s rules state that in a double-stranded DNA molecule,
32.7K
Base-pairing and DNA Repair02:27

Base-pairing and DNA Repair

89.6K
89.6K
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number02:33

Lattice Centering and Coordination Number

11.2K
The structure of a crystalline solid, whether a metal or not, is best described by considering its simplest repeating unit, which is referred to as its unit cell. The unit cell consists of lattice points that represent the locations of atoms or ions. The entire structure then consists of this unit cell repeating in three dimensions. The three different types of unit cells present in the cubic lattice are illustrated in Figure 1.
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
11.2K
Long-patch Base Excision Repair01:02

Long-patch Base Excision Repair

7.7K
Since the discovery of the two BER pathways, there has been a debate about how a cell chooses one pathway over the other and the factors determining this selection. Numerous in vitro experiments have pointed out multiple determinants for the sub-pathway selection. These are:
7.7K
Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule01:10

Interpreting ¹H NMR Signal Splitting: The (n + 1) Rule

2.3K
In the AX proton spin system, proton A can sense the two spin states of a coupled proton X, resulting in a doublet NMR signal with two peaks of equal (1:1) intensity. When proton A is coupled to two equivalent protons (AX2 spin system), the spin states of each X can be aligned with or against the external field, creating three possible scenarios. This results in a 1:2:1  triplet signal, where the central peak corresponds to the chemical shift of A and is twice as large or intense as the...
2.3K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

240
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
240

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Progressive suppression of regulated cell death defines terminal macrophage states in liver cirrhosis.

Annals of medicine·2026
Same authorSame journal

Investigations on Multiple Protein Scaffold Filling.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same author

Electrolyte-Regulated Epitaxial-Like Gradient Interface for Stable 4.8 V LiCoO<sub>2</sub>.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Persistent dysbiosis of intestinal and oral microbiota after neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Implications for surgery and microbiome intervention.

Frontiers in oncology·2026
Same author

Fueling the fire: aspartate deficiency primes and fuels STING activation.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2026
Same author

MPU-rPPG: A Comprehensive and High-Fidelity Dataset for Remote Photoplethysmography Across Diverse Conditions and Demographics.

Scientific data·2026
Same journal

GMSA: A Graph Matching and Point Cloud Registration-Based Method for Spatial Transcriptomics Data Alignment.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

Cell Type Prediction for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Utilizing Unsupervised Domain Adaptation and Semi-Supervised Learning.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

PPIGAN: Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions Using Generative Adversarial Networks.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

Deep Structure-Enhanced Cell Clustering Model for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
Same journal

Asymmetric Drug-Drug Interaction Prediction Based on Generative Adversarial Networks and Knowledge Graph.

Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K

Maximum Stacking Base Pairs: Hardness and Approximation by Nonlinear Linear Programming-Rounding.

Lixin Liu1, Haitao Jiang2,3, Peiqiang Liu3,4

  • 1School of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Journal of Computational Biology : a Journal of Computational Molecular Cell Biology
|January 7, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study addresses the maximum stacking base pairs problem in RNA secondary structure prediction. Algorithms were developed for a restricted version, achieving better-than-theoretical approximation factors on simulated data.

Keywords:
approximationlinear programming-roundingstacking base pairs

More Related Videos

Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation
08:21

Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation

Published on: November 22, 2016

10.1K
Iterative Optimization of DNA Duplexes for Crystallization of SeqA-DNA Complexes
11:42

Iterative Optimization of DNA Duplexes for Crystallization of SeqA-DNA Complexes

Published on: November 1, 2012

10.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K
Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation
08:21

Quantitative Hardness Measurement by Instrumented AFM-indentation

Published on: November 22, 2016

10.1K
Iterative Optimization of DNA Duplexes for Crystallization of SeqA-DNA Complexes
11:42

Iterative Optimization of DNA Duplexes for Crystallization of SeqA-DNA Complexes

Published on: November 1, 2012

10.3K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • Predicting ribonucleic acid (RNA) secondary structures is crucial for understanding RNA function.
  • The maximum stacking base pairs problem is a key combinatorial challenge in RNA structure prediction.
  • This problem is known to be NP-hard, posing significant computational hurdles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate a restricted version of the maximum stacking base pairs problem.
  • To develop efficient algorithms for this specific RNA structure prediction scenario.
  • To analyze the performance of these algorithms on simulated data.

Main Methods:

  • Focusing on a restricted version where base pairs are given and bases have limited associations.
  • Developing and applying novel algorithms to solve this constrained problem.
  • Evaluating algorithm performance using simulated RNA data.

Main Results:

  • The developed algorithms address the NP-hard maximum stacking base pairs problem under specific constraints.
  • Empirical results on simulated data show approximation factors superior to theoretical bounds.
  • The study provides a more tractable approach to a fundamental RNA structure problem.

Conclusions:

  • The investigated restricted problem offers a computationally feasible alternative for RNA secondary structure analysis.
  • The developed algorithms demonstrate practical efficiency and improved performance.
  • This work contributes to advancing RNA structure prediction methodologies.