What are the effects of colorectal cancer screening interventions among Asian Americans? A meta-analysis

Objective: Great strides have been made to conduct intervention studies aimed at increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates that are informed by sound theoretical frameworks and conducted using rigorous methodologies; however, efforts are still gaining wave to understand the efficacy of theory-based interventions among Asian American (AA) population. The purpose of this study was to report the results of a meta-analysis conducted on the effects of CRC screening interventions.Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used to evaluate the CRC screening interventions. Literature search was performed on October 2018, and studies published in English and conducted in the United States were eligible for inclusion if they (1) conducted interventions with aims to increase CRC screening rates among AA and (2) utilized a randomized control trial or quasi-experimental study design, (3) reported quantitative screening rates following the intervention, and (4) included a comparison or control group for comparison. No publication year restriction was applied.Result: In total, 14 Odds Ratio (OR) from 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, results indicated that AA participants who received the screening interventions aimed at improving screening were 1.78 times more likely to obtain a CRC screening at post-intervention compared to those in the control or comparison group, OR = 1.78 (1.44, 2.11).Conclusion: Understanding the efficacy of interventions designed to promote CRC screening among AA population is imperative to decrease CRC burden and mortality. Although research in this area is limited, this review sheds light on important socio-cultural strategies to developing a CRC screening intervention aimed at increasing screening rates among AA. Findings in this review demonstrate that improvement in screening can be achieved through a variety of ways, but the common feature across all the studies was the culturally responsive foundation of their respective interventions.