Development of a revised ICC-qPCR method used for Pseudorabies virus inactivation validation study of biologically

Yu Zhang1, Le Zhang2, Xiaojie Duan2

  • 1School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 610031, China; National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 102629, China.

Analytical Biochemistry
|January 10, 2020
PubMed

Insights

A revised integrated cell culture-qPCR (ICC-qPCR) method accurately assesses virus transmission risk in biological materials. This method effectively validates Pseudorabies virus (PRV) inactivation, ensuring material safety.

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Virology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Evaluating virus transmission risk in biological materials is crucial for safety.
  • Pseudorabies virus (PRV) poses a significant risk in biologically sourced materials.
  • Existing methods for virus inactivation validation may lack precision or convenience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and optimize an integrated cell culture-qPCR (ICC-qPCR) method for precise virus transmission risk evaluation.
  • To apply the revised ICC-qPCR method for validating PRV inactivation in biologically sourced materials.
  • To compare the efficacy of the revised ICC-qPCR with traditional methods.

Main Methods:

  • Establishment and optimization of an integrated cell culture-qPCR (ICC-qPCR) assay for PRV.
  • Optimization of post-infection period (12-hr) for detection limit and quantitative range.
  • Validation using mimic samples with specific inoculation and washing protocols to eliminate false positives.
  • Virus inactivation studies on acellular porcine corneas using varying irradiation doses (12 kGy and 25 kGy).
  • Comparison of results from general ICC-qPCR, revised ICC-qPCR, and standard cell culture methods.

Main Results:

  • The optimized ICC-qPCR achieved a detection limit of -0.25 Log10TCID50/100 μL and a quantitative range of 0.75-3.75 Logs.
  • Specific protocols for mimic samples effectively eliminated false positive signals from non-infectious viruses.
  • Revised ICC-qPCR showed high PRV inactivation values (4.85 Logs at 12 & 25 kGy) consistent with cell culture (5.08 Logs).
  • General ICC-qPCR yielded lower inactivation values (2.49 & 2.31 Logs) compared to revised ICC-qPCR and cell culture.

Conclusions:

  • The revised ICC-qPCR method offers a precise and convenient approach for evaluating virus transmission risk.
  • This method is effective in validating PRV inactivation in biologically sourced materials.
  • The revised ICC-qPCR demonstrates superior accuracy and consistency compared to general ICC-qPCR, with results comparable to traditional cell culture methods.

Related Concept Videos