Effect of surface treatment and cement type on dentin bonding of processed resin composite

To examine the effect of surface treatment and cement type on dentin bonding of processed resin composite restorations.

Bovine incisors were sectioned to expose mid-dentin, and randomly assigned to four different groups: Group ULT, Lava Ultimate composite blocks were bonded to dentin with RelyX Ultimate; Group ULT-CJ was treated as in Group ULT but CoJet was used to treat the intaglio surface prior to bonding; Group UNC was bonded with RelyX Unicem 2; and Group UNC-CJ was treated as in Group UNC but CoJet was used to treat the intaglio surface. RelyX Unicem 2 was used as a self-adhesive resin cement, while RelyX Ultimate was used as an adhesive resin cement with Scotchbond Universal. All adhesives and resin composites were polymerized with a high-irradiance LED polymerizing light (Elipar DeepCure-S). After bonding, all specimens were kept in 100% humidity and 37°C for 7 days and then processed for microtensile bond strength (µTBS) testing (n=15). The failure mode was analyzed under SEM as cohesive, adhesive, or mixed. Data were analyzed for statistical significance using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD post-hoc test (α=0.05).

Mean µTBS values ranged from 8.83 MPa (±3.13 MPa) for UNC to 25.63 MPa (±5.94 MPa) for ULT-CJ. Means were statistically significantly higher for the adhesive cement when compared with the self-adhesive cement (P< 0.05), and, for the adhesive cement, CoJet resulted in statistically significantly higher means (P< 0.05). The number of pre-test failures was uniform across groups (n=2-4). Failures were predominantly adhesive and mixed. The adhesive resin cement RelyX Ultimate performed significantly better than the self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem 2, and surface treatment with CoJet improved bond strengths of Lava Ultimate to dentin.

CoJet treatment and adhesive resin cements should be used when bonding laboratory/CAD-CAM processed resin composite restorations to dentin.