Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Viscoelastic Characterization of Soft Tissue-Mimicking Gelatin Phantoms using Indentation and Magnetic Resonance Elastography
Published on: May 10, 2022
Soft tissue distribution pattern of facial soft tissue fillers with different viscoelastic properties
Gianna Rosamilia1, Hassan Hamade1, David L Freytag2
1Division of Anatomy, Department of Medical Education, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
Background:
Soft tissue filler product distribution and tissue integration have been shown to depend on myriad factors including the injector type, injector size, and injection angle.
Aim:
This study aims to investigate the magnitude of product spread across fascial soft tissue layers in relation to product viscoelastic properties.
Patients/Methods:
A total of 168 injection procedures were conducted in two female Caucasian body donors with a mean age of 80 years (range: 79-81) and a mean body mass index of 23.6 kg/m2 (range: 21.0-26.6). The injection procedures were performed in the forehead, scalp, zygomatic arch, mandible, clavicle, and sternum. The injected materials included Belotero® Soft, Belotero® Balance, Belotero® Intense, Belotero® Volume, Radiesse® , and Radiesse® Plus. Layer-by-layer dissections were performed to investigate the vertical distribution of the injected product.
Results:
The mean product spread was for Belotero® Soft 4.54 ± 0.91; Belotero® Balance 3.85 ± 1.19; Belotero® Intense 3.04 ± 1.34; Belotero® Volume 2.58 ± 1.27; Radiesse® 1.31 ± 0.47; and Radiesse® Plus 1.27 ± 0.45 with P < .001. Bivariate correlations between product spread and storage modulus (G') revealed an inverse relationship of moderate strength with rp = -0.651 and P < .001.
Conclusion:
The results of the present study revealed that products that were more fluid and less viscous distributed into more superficial fascial layers than products that were less fluid and more viscous (P < .001). This relationship held true irrespective of injected location.

