Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

199
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
199
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

42.8K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
42.8K
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

254
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
254
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.7K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.7K
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics01:27

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

2.8K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
2.8K
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior01:29

Social Psychology and Individual Behavior

221
Social psychology examines how group dynamics, emotions, and cultural influences shape individual actions and decision-making. These elements interact to form behavioral patterns that affect personal choices and social interactions.The Role of Group DynamicsGroups play a crucial role in shaping behavior by reinforcing norms and expectations. Individuals derive a sense of self from group membership, often aligning their behaviors with group norms to maintain social cohesion. For example, an...
221

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<b>A new species of <i>Lampanyctus</i> (Myctophiformes: Myctophidae) from the western South Pacific Ocean</b>.

Zootaxa·2026
Same author

High coastal eddy activity around Antarctica revealed by SWOT.

National science review·2026
Same author

The Antarctic coastal ocean heat budget is dominated by heat loss to land ice melt.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Observed regimes of submesoscale dynamics in the Southern Ocean seasonal ice zone.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Remorse for discrimination: The role of group dominance in judging hate crimes against subordinate group members.

The British journal of social psychology·2025
Same author

A new species of Eustomias (Nominostomias) (Stomiiformes: Stomiidae) from the Kermadec Ridge-Tonga Trench region, western South Pacific Ocean, with notes on the barbel morphology of E. trewavasae.

Zootaxa·2024
Same journal

Visual liking as sensory valuation.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Visual preferences across species: A comparative framework.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Collective memory and historical thinking in times of uncertainty.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Does behavioral parent training benefit from cultural adaptations? A critical analysis.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Politics in psychiatry and psychotherapis in Japan with personal reflection; Is cognitive behavior therapy non-political?

Current opinion in psychology·2026
Same journal

Antisemitism in professional clinical psychology training.

Current opinion in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.1K

Power dynamics in intergroup relations.

Felicia Pratto1, Andrew L Stewart2

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, 406 Babbidge Road, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-1020, USA.

Current Opinion in Psychology
|January 11, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Intergroup power dynamics are complex. Research rarely meets all criteria for studying these dynamics, highlighting a need for advanced tools like multi-level modeling and machine learning.

More Related Videos

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.3K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.1K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.3K
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Political Science
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Intergroup relations and power dynamics are inherently complex, multilevel, and dynamic.
  • Existing research often fails to capture the full scope of these interactions.
  • Power Basis Theory provides a framework for analyzing intergroup power dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish clear criteria for identifying research that adequately addresses intergroup power dynamics.
  • To review a decade of research based on these criteria.
  • To identify gaps in the current research and suggest methods for future studies.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and applied specific criteria derived from Power Basis Theory.
  • Criteria include focus on power (not authority), attempted/actual change, protracted multi-channel interactions, and multiple social levels.
  • Reviewed 10 years of relevant theory and research.

Main Results:

  • Research meeting all established criteria for studying intergroup power dynamics is rare.
  • The review identified significant gaps in the literature concerning comprehensive analyses of power dynamics.
  • Existing studies often address only a subset of the defined criteria.

Conclusions:

  • There is a critical need for research that fully integrates the complexities of intergroup power dynamics.
  • New theoretical approaches and advanced research tools are essential to address the identified gaps.
  • Multi-level modeling, agent-based models, big data, and machine learning offer promising avenues for future research.