Extreme obesity is associated with angulation during inferior vena cava filter placement

Placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters can be complicated by venous injury, filter misplacement, angulation, insertion site injury, and procedure-related death. Currently, no studies exist evaluating the correlation between obesity and adverse outcomes of IVC filters. We aimed to assess the outcomes of IVC filter placement in the obese population using the Vascular Quality Initiative database.

The Vascular Quality Initiative registry identified 7258 patients who underwent IVC filter placement from January 2013 to June 2017. Patients were divided into three groups based on their body mass index (BMI): normal/overweight (BMI <30), obese (BMI 30-40), and extremely obese (BMI >40). Periprocedural outcomes were analyzed.

The mean age was 63.6 ± 16.6 years and 3444 patients (47%) were female. BMI was less than 30 in 4115 (56.7%), 30 to 40 in 2148 (29.6%), and greater than 40 in 995 (13.7%) patients. A complication or IVC filter-related death occurred in 142 patients (2.6%). Adverse events included angulation (1.3%), IVC filter misplacement (0.5%), insertion site injury (0.3%), IVC filter-related death (0.1%), and venous injury (0.06%). In multivariable analysis, increased BMI was found to be associated with angulation (P = .03), but was not associated with IVC filter misplacement (P = .43), or any complication or IVC filter-related death (P = .22). A subgroup analysis of IVC filter placements using only fluoroscopy demonstrated that the risk of angulation was significantly higher in patients with a BMI of greater than 40 compared with a BMI of less than 30 (odds ratio, 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.21; P = .03). There was not enough evidence to conclude that BMI was associated with any other outcome.

IVC filter insertion has low complication rates. Increased BMI is associated with an increased risk of IVC filter angulation; there is no evidence of association between BMI and other periprocedural complications.