Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 31, 2025
Field Postmortem Rabies Rapid Immunochromatographic Diagnostic Test for Resource-Limited Settings with Further Molecular Applications
Published on: June 29, 2020
Comparison of virological and serological methods for laboratory confirmation of rubella
Kiyoko Uchino1, Tatsuya Miyoshi1, Yoshio Mori2
1Sakai City Institute of Public Health, 3-2-8 Kaicho-Higashi, Sakai, Osaka, 590-0953, Japan.
Background:
Work toward rubella elimination has accelerated globally. A reliable laboratory confirmation of rubella-suspected cases is required for effective surveillance in the rubella-elimination phase. The use of adequate specimens is a key to improving the quality of this surveillance.
Study Design:
We conducted rubella virus (RUBV) isolation and RUBV genome or anti-RUBV IgM detection on 1023 specimens from 372 rubella- or measles-suspected cases collected through the national surveillance program in Sakai city of Osaka prefecture, Japan between 2011 and 2013. The resulting data were analyzed by specimen type, collection date, and immunological status.
Results:
Among the three specimen types (throat swab, serum or plasma, and urine) collected through 10 days post-rash onset, the highest success rates for RUBV genome detection and RUBV isolation were obtained using throat swabs. In agreement with previous work, RUBV-specific IgM were undetectable in 50% of the rubella-confirmed cases until 3 days after rash onset. The success rates of RUBV genome detection and RUBV isolation declined in association with the appearance of RUBV-specific antibodies in blood, especially in serum, plasma, or urine samples.
Conclusion:
Throat swabs are the most optimal specimen types for both RUBV genome detection and RUBV isolation; serum/plasma samples may be suboptimal, especially for RUBV isolation. The findings from this study will provide useful information for improving laboratory surveillance for rubella in the elimination phase.
