Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.9K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.9K
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

11.7K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
11.7K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.3K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.3K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.5K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.5K
Behrens–Fisher Test00:57

Behrens–Fisher Test

217
The Behrens-Fisher test is a statistical method designed to address the Behrens-Fisher problem, which arises when comparing the means of two normally distributed populations with unequal variances. Unlike the Student's t-test, which assumes equal variances, the Behrens-Fisher test allows for mean comparison without this restrictive assumption. This flexibility makes it particularly valuable in scenarios where two independent samples exhibit normality but lack variance homogeneity.
This test...
217
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

451
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
451

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Binomial effect size displays and gain-probability: Alternative ways to interpret hierarchical regression findings, with tutorial.

Psychological methods·2026
Same author

A gain-probability way to interpret correlation coefficients: A tutorial.

Psychological methods·2025
Same author

An exploration of physics envy with implications for desiderata of psychology theories.

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Improving inferential analyses predata and postdata.

Psychological methods·2024
Same author

A nuanced view of the extent to which samples from narrow populations are scientifically problematic.

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Enhancing predictive power by unamalgamating multi-item scales.

Psychological methods·2023
Same journal

A Simple Approach for Differential Test Functioning Based on Sum Scores.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Factor Retention in Large Factor Analysis Models: A Simulation Study Comparing 15 Methods.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Agreement and Alignment in Binary Rating Tasks: Strategic Convergence as an Equilibrium Outcome.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Interactions Between Termination Criteria and Ability Estimators in Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

Identification and Diagnosis of Misreporting in Surveys.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
Same journal

The Aggregated Latent Profile Index: Measuring Person Profile Differentiation Within a Bootstrap-Validated Latent Profile Space.

Educational and psychological measurement·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K

Making the A Priori Procedure Work for Differences Between Means.

David Trafimow1, Cong Wang1, Tonghui Wang1

  • 1New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA.

Educational and Psychological Measurement
|January 15, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study expands the a priori power analysis procedure to include tests of differences between means. New equations accommodate both matched and independent samples for more accurate research planning.

Keywords:
a priori procedureindependent samplesmatched samplesmeans

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 31, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Psychometrics
  • Quantitative Psychology

Background:

  • The a priori procedure is a statistical method for determining sample size before data collection.
  • Existing a priori methods primarily focus on sample means approximating population means.
  • A limitation is the lack of methods for sample size determination when the primary interest is the difference between means.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend the a priori procedure to accommodate statistical power analysis for differences between means.
  • To provide researchers with tools for planning studies where the focus is on mean differences.
  • To address the limitation of existing a priori methods in handling mean differences.

Main Methods:

  • Development of new statistical equations.
  • Expansion of the existing a priori procedure.
  • Application to both matched and independent samples.

Main Results:

  • New equations are proposed for the a priori procedure to calculate sample size for detecting differences between means.
  • The expanded procedure is applicable to matched-pair designs and independent group designs.
  • The findings provide a more comprehensive approach to a priori power analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The enhanced a priori procedure offers a more versatile tool for researchers planning studies involving mean comparisons.
  • This expansion addresses a critical gap in existing power analysis methodologies.
  • The proposed equations facilitate more precise sample size determination for studies examining mean differences.