Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.7K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.7K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

360
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
360
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

16.6K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
16.6K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reasonable social cognition.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

The psychology of offensive and defensive intergroup violence: Preregistered insights from 58 countries.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Measuring the semantic priming effect across many languages.

Nature human behaviour·2025
Same author

The Reasonable, the Rational, and the Good: On Folk Theories of Deliberative Judgment.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2025
Same author

Commonly observed sex differences in direct aggression are absent or reversed in sibling contexts.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Wisdom reconsidered: A dynamic network account of metacognition and complex thought.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 31, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.2K

Folk standards of sound judgment: Rationality Versus Reasonableness.

Igor Grossmann1, Richard P Eibach1, Jacklyn Koyama2

  • 1University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.

Science Advances
|January 15, 2020
PubMed
Summary

People distinguish between rationality and reasonableness in judgment. Rationality is seen as maximizing preferences, while reasonableness considers social context and moral concerns, impacting decisions in economic games.

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 31, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.2K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Legal Scholarship

Background:

  • Normative theories of judgment distinguish between rationality (preference maximization) and reasonableness (social norms).
  • Limited research explores how laypeople conceptualize and apply these distinct judgment frameworks.
  • Understanding lay intuitions is crucial for bridging theoretical concepts with real-world behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate laypeople's understanding and application of rationality and reasonableness.
  • To compare how these concepts influence judgment in economic decision-making tasks.
  • To examine cross-cultural and economic context differences in these judgments.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of spontaneous descriptions, social perceptions, and linguistic content (news, media, legal texts).
  • Experimental studies using Dictator Games, Commons Dilemma, and Prisoner's Dilemma with diverse samples (North Americans, Pakistani bankers, merchants).
  • Comparison of judgments based on rationality versus reasonableness frameworks.

Main Results:

  • Laypeople perceive rationality as abstract and preference-maximizing, distinct from reasonableness, which is context-sensitive.
  • Rationality and reasonableness lead to divergent conclusions in economic games.
  • Cross-cultural and economic samples demonstrate differing applications of rationality and reasonableness.

Conclusions:

  • Laypeople possess distinct, context-dependent intuitions about rationality and reasonableness.
  • Reasonableness integrates social and moral considerations, offering a more nuanced judgment than pure rationality.
  • Findings highlight the importance of considering both frameworks for a comprehensive understanding of human judgment.