Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

124
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
124
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

165
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
165
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

4.4K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.4K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.9K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.9K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

805
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
805

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dual mobility versus standard cups in total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures (Duality): an international, multicentre, randomised, controlled, superiority trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Genetic and epidemiological evidence linking respiratory and musculoskeletal diseases: shared risk factors and intervention windows.

Respiratory research·2026
Same author

Beyond en-bloc turning: dynamics of head-pelvis coordination in 360° turns in people with Parkinson's.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Stakeholder perspectives on the potential benefits, risks, and implications of an interactive cognitive monitoring app for the identification and monitoring of cognitive decline in adults at risk of dementia.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Validity and Reliability of the Track-UL Algorithm Compared With Kinovea Software for Measuring Upper-Limb Functional Range of Motion in People After Stroke: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 30, 2025

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

3.4K

Bayesian adaptive designs for multi-arm trials: an orthopaedic case study.

Elizabeth G Ryan1, Sarah E Lamb2,3, Esther Williamson2

  • 1Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. E.G.Ryan@bham.ac.uk.

Trials
|January 16, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian adaptive designs offer greater efficiency for multi-arm clinical trials. These methods, demonstrated in the Collaborative Ankle Support Trial, can lead to earlier results and better patient allocation.

Keywords:
Arm droppingBayesian adaptive designEmergency medicineInterim analysisMonitoringMulti-arm trialOrthopaedicPhase IIIRandomised controlled trialsResponse adaptive randomisation

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring
06:32

Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.7K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

695

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 30, 2025

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

3.4K
Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring
06:32

Author Spotlight: Automated Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease - Exploring the Possibilities and Challenges of Home Monitoring

Published on: July 14, 2023

1.7K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

695

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Adaptive Trial Design

Background:

  • Bayesian adaptive designs offer enhanced efficiency compared to traditional methods in multi-arm randomized controlled trials.
  • The Collaborative Ankle Support Trial (CAST) provides a case study for evaluating these designs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the construction of Bayesian adaptive designs for phase III multi-arm clinical trials.
  • To assess the potential benefits, such as increased efficiency and improved patient allocation, offered by these designs.

Main Methods:

  • Five Bayesian adaptive designs were constructed for the CAST study, incorporating response adaptive randomization (RAR), arm dropping, and early stopping for efficacy or futility.
  • Operating characteristics were studied via simulation, and virtual re-executions using CAST patient data demonstrated practical applicability.

Main Results:

  • All constructed Bayesian adaptive designs exhibited high statistical power and recruited fewer patients than the original trial's target sample size.
  • Virtual trial executions indicated that Bayesian designs were more likely to identify superior interventions and allocate patients to better-performing treatment arms.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian adaptive designs can be effectively constructed for phase III multi-arm trials using clinically relevant criteria.
  • These designs show potential for earlier trial conclusions and optimized patient enrollment in superior treatment arms, warranting wider adoption.