Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Large-scale Recording of Neurons by Movable Silicon Probes in Behaving Rodents
Published on: March 4, 2012
Locating the engram: Should we look for plastic synapses or information-storing molecules?
Jesse J Langille1, Charles R Gallistel2
1McGill University, Montréal Neurological Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Neurobiology debates two memory theories: associative/connectionist (A/C) and computational/representational (C/R). Both see memory emerging from the brain, but differ on its neural substrate and location.
Area of Science:
- Neurobiology
- Cognitive Science
- Neuroscience
Background:
- The search for the engram, the physical trace of memory, began nearly seventy years ago.
- Contemporary neurobiology features two main theories of learning and memory: associative/connectionist (A/C) and computational/representational (C/R).
Purpose of the Study:
- To present and contrast the associative/connectionist (A/C) and computational/representational (C/R) conceptions of memory.
- To highlight areas of agreement and contention between these two neurobiological theories.
- To discuss unresolved questions and potential future research directions for understanding the neurobiological basis of memory.
Main Methods:
- Review and synthesis of existing theories on the neurobiological basis of learning and memory.
- Comparative analysis of the associative/connectionist and computational/representational models.
- Identification of key unresolved questions and proposed future research avenues.
Main Results:
- The A/C theory posits memory cognition emerges from patterned neural activity and reorganized synaptic strengths, which provide a blueprint for neural activity but are not symbolic themselves.
- The C/R theory proposes memory resides in intracellular molecular structures that function as information-processing units, akin to computer memory.
- Both theories acknowledge memory as an emergent property of the brain but differ on whether the substrate is at the circuit or intracellular molecular level.
Conclusions:
- Significant divisions persist in understanding the neurobiological substrate of memory.
- New research necessitates a re-evaluation and discussion of both A/C and C/R theories.
- Further investigation is required to resolve key questions regarding the neural basis of memory and learning.
More Related Videos
06:35In Vivo Optical Calcium Imaging of Learning-Induced Synaptic Plasticity in Drosophila melanogaster
Published on: October 8, 2019
11:31Ex Vivo Optogenetic Interrogation of Long-Range Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity from Medial Prefrontal Cortex to Lateral Entorhinal Cortex
Published on: February 25, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Synaptic Signaling
The Synapse
Synaptic Signaling
Most synapses are chemical, meaning an electrical impulse or action potential spurs the release of chemical messengers called neurotransmitters. The neuron sending the signal is called the presynaptic neuron, and the neuron receiving the signal is the postsynaptic neuron.
The presynaptic neuron fires an action potential that...
Chemical Synapses
Because chemical synapses depend on the release of neurotransmitter molecules from synaptic vesicles to pass on their signal, there is an approximately one millisecond delay between when the axon potential reaches the presynaptic terminal and when the neurotransmitter leads to opening of postsynaptic ion channels. Additionally, this signaling is...
Chemical Synapses
Because chemical synapses depend on the release of neurotransmitter molecules from synaptic vesicles to pass on their signal, there is an approximately one millisecond delay between when the axon potential reaches the presynaptic terminal and when the neurotransmitter leads to opening of postsynaptic ion channels. Additionally, this signaling is...
Storage