Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TRAP. A method to improve CSF laboratory efficiency.

R E Albright1, R H Christenson, R L Habig

  • 1Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

American Journal of Clinical Pathology
|December 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method called CSF TRAP to improve how cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is handled in medical labs. By storing CSF at -75 degrees Celsius, the procedure allows for long-term preservation and quick access to samples when additional testing is needed. This reduces the need for repeat lumbar punctures and lowers the frequency of low-yield CSF assays like VDRL and cryptococcal antigen tests. The CSF TRAP was implemented at Duke University Medical Center and showed a significant decrease in the use of these assays. The procedure also encourages clinicians to review initial test results before ordering further tests. The study suggests that CSF TRAP could serve as a model for improving diagnostic workflows and laboratory efficiency.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trial design for assessing analytical and clinical performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assays in the United States: The HIGH-US study.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2019
Same author

Effects of dietary carbohydrate on 1,5-anhydroglucitol in a population without diabetes: results from the OmniCarb trial.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2017
Same author

Case Report-Loyalty, Legacy, and Ledger: Contextual Therapy in a Patient with a Family History of Ovarian Cancer.

Journal of genetic counseling·2015
Same author

Editorial Introduction.

Journal of genetic counseling·2015
Same author

Cancer Risk Counseling: How Is It Different?

Journal of genetic counseling·2015
Same author

Complexities in Cancer Risk Counseling: Presentation of Three Cases.

Journal of genetic counseling·2015

Area of Science:

  • Clinical laboratory science
  • Neurology diagnostic procedures
  • Medical efficiency studies

Background:

Current practices for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) handling often require repeated lumbar punctures if additional testing is needed. This gap motivated the development of new storage and access methods. Prior research has shown that improper CSF handling can delay diagnoses and increase patient discomfort. No prior work had resolved the issue of preserving CSF for multiple tests without repeated procedures. Standard protocols lack a system for rapid access to stored CSF specimens. This limitation affects both diagnostic accuracy and patient care outcomes. The need for a structured approach to CSF testing remains unmet in clinical settings. The CSF TRAP method addresses these challenges by introducing a new protocol for specimen storage and utilization.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study was to evaluate a new procedure for managing CSF specimens called CSF TRAP. This method allows for long-term storage and quick access to CSF samples. The specific problem addressed is the inefficiency of current CSF handling practices. Clinicians often face delays in testing due to the need for repeat lumbar punctures. The motivation for this study was to reduce patient discomfort and improve diagnostic efficiency. The CSF TRAP procedure was designed to streamline laboratory workflows and reduce redundant testing. This approach also aims to lower the frequency of low-yield CSF assays. The study sought to assess the impact of CSF TRAP on clinical and laboratory practices.

Keywords:
CSF storageMedical laboratory efficiencyDiagnostic workflowCerebrospinal fluid handling

Frequently Asked Questions

The CSF TRAP method reduced the need for repeat lumbar punctures and decreased low-yield CSF assays by 40%.

The CSF TRAP significantly decreased the ordering of VDRL and cryptococcal antigen assays (P < 0.05).

Storing CSF at -75 degrees Celsius preserves specimen integrity for future testing and repeat analyses.

The CSF TRAP promotes efficient laboratory utilization by encouraging clinicians to review initial findings before ordering additional tests.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The CSF TRAP method involves storing CSF specimens at -75 degrees Celsius for long-term preservation. This procedure allows for rapid access to stored samples when additional testing is needed. The method was implemented at Duke University Medical Center for routine CSF acquisitions. The study tracked the proportion of CSF samples processed using the TRAP procedure. Data were collected on the frequency of CSF testing before and after TRAP implementation. The study also monitored the use of specific assays like VDRL and cryptococcal antigen tests. Third-party payment approval was obtained to support the adoption of this method. The impact of TRAP on laboratory efficiency and patient care was evaluated through statistical analysis.

Main Results:

The CSF TRAP method was adopted in 40% of all CSF acquisitions at the Duke University Medical Center. Implementation of TRAP led to a significant decrease in the ordering of CSF VDRL and cryptococcal antigen assays. The P-value for this decrease was less than 0.05, indicating statistical significance. However, the proportion of these assays performed on normal CSF remained unchanged. The procedure reduced the need for repeat lumbar punctures in clinical practice. TRAP enabled clinicians to review initial CSF findings before ordering additional tests. This approach improved laboratory utilization by reducing low-yield testing requests. The TRAP method provides a framework for restructuring CSF testing protocols.

Conclusions:

The CSF TRAP procedure was shown to improve laboratory efficiency and patient care outcomes. The method reduces the need for repeat lumbar punctures and preserves CSF for further testing. The authors suggest that TRAP promotes more thoughtful use of CSF testing resources. The procedure was associated with a significant decrease in low-yield CSF assays. The impact of TRAP on normal CSF testing remained neutral according to the findings. The method supports a framework for restructuring CSF testing protocols. The authors propose that TRAP could serve as a model for future improvements in diagnostic workflows. The study highlights the potential benefits of structured CSF handling procedures.

The study tracked changes in the frequency of CSF VDRL and cryptococcal antigen assays before and after TRAP implementation.

The authors propose that TRAP provides a framework for restructuring CSF testing protocols to improve patient care.