Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

07:42
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
659
In vitro evaluation of a ceramic bracket with a laser-structured base
1Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, University of Ondokuz Mayis, 55139 Kurupelit, Samsun, Turkey. elekdagturk@yahoo.com.
BMC Oral Health
|January 23, 2020
Summary
The Pearl ceramic bracket demonstrated superior shear bond strength compared to the Fascination 2 bracket. Both bracket types showed favorable adhesive remnant characteristics and no enamel or bracket damage, paving the way for clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Orthodontic Research
- Biomaterials Engineering
Background:
- Assessing the performance of ceramic brackets is crucial for orthodontic treatment.
- Understanding shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant characteristics informs bracket selection.
- Evaluating enamel and bracket integrity post-testing ensures material safety and efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of Discovery Pearl and Fascination 2 ceramic brackets.
- To assess adhesive remnant characteristics and the integrity of enamel and brackets after SBS testing.
- To compare the performance of Pearl and Fascination 2 ceramic brackets in an in vitro setting.
Main Methods:
- Sixty maxillary first premolars were bonded with either Pearl or Fascination 2 brackets.
- Samples underwent thermocycling (1000 cycles) followed by SBS testing.
- Statistical analyses included independent samples t-test, Weibull analysis, and chi-square test for ARI.
Main Results:
- Pearl brackets exhibited significantly higher mean SBS (13.01 ± 2.50 MPa) than Fascination 2 brackets (10.50 ± 2.61 MPa).
- A significant difference in adhesive remnant index (ARI) was observed, with a higher frequency of scores 2 and 3 for Pearl brackets.
- No enamel damage or bracket fracturing occurred in either group.
Conclusions:
- The Pearl ceramic bracket shows promising results in terms of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant characteristics.
- The in vitro findings support the potential for clinical investigation of the Pearl ceramic bracket.
- Both ceramic bracket types maintained excellent integrity of enamel and brackets throughout the study.

