Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Variation in State Laws on Access to Civil Protection Orders for Adolescents Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence
Avanti Adhia1, Jaron Goddard2, Mary A Kernic3
1Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Most states allow minors to obtain civil protection orders (CPOs) for intimate partner violence (IPV), but laws vary significantly regarding filing rights and recognized abuse types. Improving these laws can help reduce adolescent IPV.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Legal Studies
- Sociology
Background:
- Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health issue affecting adolescents.
- Civil protection orders (CPOs) are a primary legal tool for victims of IPV to seek safety and prevent further abuse.
- Existing legislation regarding adolescent access to CPOs presents a complex and varied landscape across U.S. states.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively assess the current state of legislation concerning adolescents' access to civil protection orders (CPOs) for intimate partner violence (IPV).
- To identify variations in state laws that may create barriers for minors seeking legal protection from IPV.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of statutes across all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia was conducted.
- Legislation was analyzed based on five key indicators: eligibility for minors, minor's ability to file independently, recognition of dating relationships, definitions of qualifying abuse, and firearm restrictions.
Main Results:
- Nearly all states (94%) permit minors to obtain CPOs, but only 27% allow them to file independently.
- Dating relationships are recognized in 86% of states.
- While physical violence is covered in 100% of states, psychological/emotional violence is covered in only 55%.
- Firearm prohibitions and surrender requirements are included in CPOs in 43% of states.
Conclusions:
- Significant legislative disparities exist in U.S. states regarding CPOs for adolescent IPV.
- Enhancing statutes to lower barriers for legal recourse is crucial for addressing and reducing IPV among adolescents.
- Standardizing and strengthening CPO laws can provide more effective protection for young victims of intimate partner violence.
More Related Videos
07:56Assessing the Coherence of Parents' Short Narratives Regarding their Child Using the Five-Minute Speech Sample Procedure
Published on: September 19, 2019
08:59The Other End of the Leash: An Experimental Test to Analyze How Owners Interact with Their Pet Dogs
Published on: October 13, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Conduct Disorder
Bullying
Parenting Styles
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative...
Standards of Care I
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture