Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Application of Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Segmentation via Orbital Computed Tomography
Published on: November 30, 2022
Melanoma recognition by a deep learning convolutional neural network-Performance in different melanoma subtypes and
Julia K Winkler1, Katharina Sies1, Christine Fink1
1Department of Dermatology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) show high diagnostic potential for melanoma, especially for common subtypes. However, their performance is limited for mucosal and subungual melanomas, requiring further training.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNNs) demonstrate significant promise for melanoma diagnosis.
- Melanoma thickness, influenced by location and subtype, presents diagnostic challenges.
- The ability of CNNs to address these challenges, particularly in difficult subtypes, remains under-investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a European market-approved CNN across various melanoma localizations and subtypes.
- To determine if CNNs can assist physicians in diagnosing challenging melanoma cases.
Main Methods:
- A commercial CNN (Moleanalyzer-Pro®) was utilized for binary classification (malignant/benign) on six distinct dermoscopic image sets.
- Each set comprised 30 melanomas and 100 benign lesions, representing specific localizations and morphologies (superficial spreading, lentigo maligna, nodular, mucosal, acrolentiginous skin, and subungual).
Main Results:
- The CNN achieved high performance (sensitivity >93.3%, specificity >65%, ROC-AUC >0.926) in superficial spreading, nodular, and lentigo maligna melanomas.
- For acrolentiginous melanomas of the skin, performance was good (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 91.0%, ROC-AUC 0.928).
- Limited diagnostic performance was observed for mucosal melanomas (specificity 38.0%) and subungual melanomas (sensitivity 53.3%, specificity 68.0%, ROC-AUC 0.621).
Conclusions:
- CNNs can partially compensate for reduced human diagnostic accuracy in melanoma detection.
- Physicians must be aware of the CNN's limitations in diagnosing mucosal and subungual melanomas.
- Enhanced CNN performance in these challenging sites may be achieved through additional, targeted training data.
More Related Videos
09:37Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition
Published on: August 18, 2022
09:58DNA-barcode-based Multiplex Immunofluorescence Imaging to Analyze FFPE Specimens from Genetically Reprogrammed Murine Melanoma
Published on: June 6, 2025