Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

577
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
577
Introspection01:29

Introspection

168
Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...
168
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.2K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.2K
Subconsciousness and No Awareness01:15

Subconsciousness and No Awareness

582
The concept of subconscious awareness refers to the processing of information below the level of conscious thought, which significantly influences both behaviors and decisions. It is also known as waking subconscious awareness. This complex level of cognition operates without the direct awareness of the individual, facilitating rapid and simultaneous handling of multiple information streams.
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...
582

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Telephone Games: How Issues With Common Citation Practices Established the Inverse Efficiency Score.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same author

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Is multitasking efficient? Different metrics, different conclusions.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Temporal cueing of conflict reduces congruency effects in the Eriksen flanker and Simon tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

An attempt to replicate action-effect learning and its generalization without stimulus-stimulus learning.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Ten years Diffusion Model for Conflict (DMC) tasks: Theoretical foundations, applications, practical recommendations, and open challenges.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.5K

Introspection about backward crosstalk in dual-task performance.

Daniel Bratzke1, Markus Janczyk2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. daniel.bratzke@uni-tuebingen.de.

Psychological Research
|January 25, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study shows people can accurately sense dual-task interference, even when unaware of specific effects like the psychological refractory period (PRP). Introspection about task demands in dual tasks is surprisingly reliable yet also limited.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.0K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.5K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.0K
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Factors
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Dual-tasking involves performing multiple tasks simultaneously, often leading to performance decrements.
  • Between-task crosstalk, where one task influences another, is a key factor in dual-task performance.
  • Understanding introspection in complex cognitive tasks is crucial for designing effective human-computer interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate participants' introspective accuracy regarding between-task crosstalk in dual tasks.
  • To examine the reliability of introspective reaction times (IRTs) in a backward crosstalk dual-task paradigm.
  • To explore the interplay between objective performance and subjective awareness of task demands.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments utilized a compatibility-based backward crosstalk dual task.
  • Participants provided introspective reaction times (IRTs) after trials or trial pairs.
  • Objective performance measures were compared with subjective IRTs.

Main Results:

  • Objective performance revealed a typical backward crosstalk effect and sequential modulation.
  • Introspective reaction times (IRTs) mirrored the patterns observed in objective performance.
  • Despite unawareness of the psychological refractory period (PRP) effect, IRTs showed high reliability.

Conclusions:

  • Between-task crosstalk is a reliable phenomenon in dual tasks.
  • Introspection regarding temporal processing demands in dual tasks is both accurate and limited.
  • Findings highlight the complex nature of metacognition in demanding cognitive situations.