Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
True and false alibis among prisoners and their detection by police detectives
Ricardo Nieuwkamp1, Robert Horselenberg1, Peter van Koppen1,2
1Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
The present study was designed to determine whether differences exist between true and false alibis and how accurate police detectives and lay people are in determining the veracity of alibis. This article provides a replication of the research by Culhane et al. (2013) with more representative participants. In the first experiment, real suspects in a remand prison generated true or false alibis. In the second experiment, a subset of those alibis were written out and were provided to experienced police officers and students for alibi evaluation and discrimination. Our results show that differentiating between true and false alibis is difficult, and even when more representative materials and participants are included, the accuracy did not exceed 60%. Interestingly we found that students and police officers focus on other aspects during the alibi discrimination. Thus, research using student participant cannot be, directly, used in alibi discrimination studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Blind Procedures

