Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Structure-Property Relationships of Fe4 S4 Clusters
Maike Bergeler1, Martin T Stiebritz1, Markus Reiher1
1Laboratorium für Physikalische Chemie, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 10, 8093 Zurich (Switzerland), Fax: (+41) 44-633-15-94.
Abstract:
In this theoretical study, the sensitivity of Fe4 S4 cluster properties, such as potential energy, spin coupling, adiabatic detachment energy, inner-sphere reorganization energy, and reactivity, to structural distortions is investigated. [Fe4 S4 (SH)4 ]3-/2-/1- model clusters anchored by fixed hydrogen atoms are compared with Fe4 S4 clusters coordinated by ethyl thiolates with fixations according to cysteine residues in crystal structures. For the model system, a dependence of the ground-state spin-coupling scheme on the hydrogen-hydrogen distances is observed. The minima of the potential energy surface of [Fe4 S4 (SH)4 ]2-/1- clusters are located at slightly smaller hydrogen-hydrogen distances than those of the [Fe4 S4 (SH)4 ]3- cluster. For inner-sphere reorganization energies the spin-coupling scheme adopted by the broken-symmetry wave function plays an important role, since it can change the reorganization energies by up to 13 kcal mol-1 . For most structures, [Fe4 S4 (SR)4 ]2- and [Fe4 S4 (SR)4 ]1- (R=H or ethyl, derived from cysteine) favor the same coupling scheme. Therefore, the reorganization energies for this redox couple are relatively low (6-12 kcal mol-1 ) compared with the 2-/3- redox couple favoring different spin-coupling schemes before and after electron transfer (14-18 kcal mol-1 ). However, one may argue that more reliable reorganization energies are obtained if always the same spin-coupling pattern is enforced. All theoretical observations and insights are discussed in the light of experimental results distilled from the literature.
Related Concept Videos
Ionic Crystal Structures
Most monatomic ions behave as charged spheres, and their attraction for ions of opposite charge is the same in every direction. Consequently, stable structures for ionic compounds result (1) when ions of one charge are surrounded by as many ions as possible of the opposite...
VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Valence Bond Theory
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals II

