Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 30, 2025

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Effects of Intracoronary Alteplase on Microvascular Function in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Annette M Maznyczka1,2, Peter J McCartney1,2, Keith G Oldroyd1,2
1British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences University of Glasgow Glasgow United Kingdom.
Insights
Adjunctive intracoronary alteplase did not improve microvascular function in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients. This study found no significant differences in key microcirculatory measures between alteplase and placebo groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Microcirculation Research
Background:
- Impaired microcirculatory reperfusion is linked to worse outcomes in acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- The T-TIME trial previously showed no difference in microvascular obstruction with adjunctive intracoronary alteplase during primary PCI.
- This substudy investigates alteplase's effect on specific microvascular function indices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of intracoronary alteplase on the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and resistive reserve ratio (RRR).
- To analyze these effects in relation to ischemic time in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Main Methods:
- A prespecified physiology substudy of the T-TIME trial involving 144 STEMI patients (ischemic time ≤6 hours).
- Patients received intracoronary alteplase (10 or 20 mg) or placebo postreperfusion, pre-stenting.
- IMR, CFR, and RRR were measured post-PCI; cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed at 2-7 days and 3 months.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in overall IMR, CFR, or RRR were observed between alteplase and placebo groups.
- Significant interactions between ischemic time and alteplase treatment were found for CFR, RRR, and microvascular obstruction (p<0.05).
- No interaction was observed for IMR.
Conclusions:
- Intracoronary alteplase, at the doses tested, did not improve microvascular function in STEMI patients with ischemic time ≤6 hours.
- The benefit of alteplase may be dependent on ischemic time, as suggested by interaction analyses.
- Further research is needed to clarify the role of alteplase in specific patient subgroups based on ischemic duration.
Abstract:
Background Impaired microcirculatory reperfusion worsens prognosis following acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. In the T-TIME (A Trial of Low-Dose Adjunctive Alteplase During Primary PCI) trial, microvascular obstruction on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging did not differ with adjunctive, low-dose, intracoronary alteplase (10 or 20 mg) versus placebo during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. We evaluated the effects of intracoronary alteplase, during primary percutaneous coronary intervention, on the index of microcirculatory resistance, coronary flow reserve, and resistive reserve ratio. Methods and Results A prespecified physiology substudy of the T-TIME trial. From 2016 to 2017, patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction ≤6 hours from symptom onset were randomized in a double-blind study to receive alteplase 20 mg, alteplase 10 mg, or placebo infused into the culprit artery postreperfusion, but prestenting. Index of microcirculatory resistance, coronary flow reserve, and resistive reserve ratio were measured after percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance was performed at 2 to 7 days and 3 months. Analyses in relation to ischemic time (<2, 2-4, and ≥4 hours) were prespecified. One hundred forty-four patients (mean age, 59±11 years; 80% male) were prospectively enrolled, representing 33% of the overall population (n=440). Overall, index of microcirculatory resistance (median, 29.5; interquartile range, 17.0-55.0), coronary flow reserve(1.4 [1.1-2.0]), and resistive reserve ratio (1.7 [1.3-2.3]) at the end of percutaneous coronary intervention did not differ between treatment groups. Interactions were observed between ischemic time and alteplase for coronary flow reserve (P=0.013), resistive reserve ratio (P=0.026), and microvascular obstruction (P=0.022), but not index of microcirculatory resistance. Conclusions In ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction with ischemic time ≤6 hours, there was overall no difference in microvascular function with alteplase versus placebo. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02257294.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

