Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.2K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.3K
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

535
Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of...
535
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

316
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
316
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

332
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
332
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

9.3K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
9.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pasture Heterogeneity Improves Donkey Welfare: Effects of Structural Variation, Species Diversity, and Sward Height on Herd Emotional States.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2025
Same author

Natural soundscapes enhance mood recovery amid anthropogenic noise pollution.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Sexual segregation occurs in bats within fragmented remnant woodlands in an agricultural landscape.

Ecology and evolution·2022
Same author

Environmental risk factors associated with bovine tuberculosis among cattle in high-risk areas.

Biology letters·2015
Same author

Leptospirosis acquisition following the reintroduction of wildlife.

The Veterinary record·2015
Same author

City life makes females fussy: sex differences in habitat use of temperate bats in urban areas.

Royal Society open science·2015
Same journal

Between principles and practice: exploring transformative discourses in a Dutch National Park.

Biodiversity and conservation·2026
Same journal

Benthic diatoms and phytoplankton diversity in urban streams and ponds: charting a course for conservation.

Biodiversity and conservation·2026
Same journal

Assessing direct effects of insect change on insectivore populations in the United Kingdom.

Biodiversity and conservation·2026
Same journal

Logging intensity alters tree species composition and wood density, but not tree diversity, in lowland forests in Vietnam.

Biodiversity and conservation·2026
Same journal

Mycorrhizal fungal associations of the fringed orchids (<i>Platanthera</i>) in the US, inter- and intra-species variation.

Biodiversity and conservation·2026
Same journal

How effective are ecological metrics in supporting conservation and management in degraded streams?

Biodiversity and conservation·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Nest Building Behavior as an Early Indicator of Behavioral Deficits in Mice
06:11

Nest Building Behavior as an Early Indicator of Behavioral Deficits in Mice

Published on: October 19, 2019

21.0K

Basic mathematical errors may make ecological assessments unreliable.

P R Lintott1, F Mathews1

  • 1Hatherly Laboratories, Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, EX4 4PS UK.

Biodiversity and Conservation
|January 31, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) often misinterpret ecological data by relying on the mean, potentially leading to flawed planning decisions. Standardizing data processing is crucial for reliable evidence-based conservation strategies.

Keywords:
ChiropteraConservation managementEnvironmental impact assessmentMitigationStatistics

More Related Videos

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
08:14

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

Published on: April 28, 2023

687
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Nest Building Behavior as an Early Indicator of Behavioral Deficits in Mice
06:11

Nest Building Behavior as an Early Indicator of Behavioral Deficits in Mice

Published on: October 19, 2019

21.0K
Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
08:14

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

Published on: April 28, 2023

687
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Environmental Science
  • Conservation Biology

Background:

  • Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are legally mandated tools for informing planning decisions.
  • The efficacy of EIAs is often uncertain, despite their significant cost and legislative basis.
  • Ecological data summarization, particularly using the mean, can be misleading if data distributions are skewed.

Discussion:

  • EIAs frequently use the mean or undefined 'average' to summarize ecological data, such as bat populations.
  • This practice can lead to systematic misinterpretation of evidence and inaccurate risk assessment.
  • Lack of standardized data processing in EIAs undermines evidence-based decision-making.

Key Insights:

  • The mean is often an inappropriate summary statistic for skewed ecological data.
  • Misleading data summaries in EIAs have serious implications for conservation planning and risk assessment.
  • Transparent and systematic data processing is essential for reliable environmental assessments.

Outlook:

  • There is a critical need for clear guidance on data processing techniques in EIAs.
  • Standardized methods will ensure planning decisions are based on a firm evidence base.
  • Improved data handling will lead to cost-effective and proportionate mitigation and conservation strategies.