Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Embryo Microinjection and Knockout Mutant Identification of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome-Edited Helicoverpa Armigera Hübner
Published on: July 1, 2021
Domain-specific introduction to machine learning terminology, pitfalls and opportunities in CRISPR-based gene editing
Aidan R O'Brien1,2, Gaetan Burgio2, Denis C Bauer1,3
1Health and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abstract:
The use of machine learning (ML) has become prevalent in the genome engineering space, with applications ranging from predicting target site efficiency to forecasting the outcome of repair events. However, jargon and ML-specific accuracy measures have made it hard to assess the validity of individual approaches, potentially leading to misinterpretation of ML results. This review aims to close the gap by discussing ML approaches and pitfalls in the context of CRISPR gene-editing applications. Specifically, we address common considerations, such as algorithm choice, as well as problems, such as overestimating accuracy and data interoperability, by providing tangible examples from the genome-engineering domain. Equipping researchers with the knowledge to effectively use ML to better design gene-editing experiments and predict experimental outcomes will help advance the field more rapidly.
Related Concept Videos
CRISPR
CRISPR and crRNAs
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing
What is Genetic Engineering?
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
Homologous Recombination

