Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Removal of Trace Elements by Cupric Oxide Nanoparticles from Uranium In Situ Recovery Bleed Water and Its Effect on Cell Viability
Published on: June 21, 2015
Urban geochemical changes and pollution with potentially harmful elements in seven Russian cities
Andrian A Seleznev1,2, Ilia V Yarmoshenko3, Georgy P Malinovsky3
1Institute of Industrial Ecology, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Postal address: S. Kovalevskoy, Str., 20, 620219, Ekaterinburg, Russia. sandrian@rambler.ru.
This study analyzed potentially harmful elements (PHEs) in urban sediment across seven Russian cities. New criteria revealed that a city
Area of Science:
- Environmental Geochemistry
- Urban Geochemistry
- Pollution Monitoring
Background:
- Urban surface deposited sediment (USDS) accumulates pollutants, reflecting environmental conditions.
- Potentially harmful elements (PHEs) like lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu) pose risks.
- Establishing initial geochemical baselines is crucial for assessing urban pollution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze PHE concentrations (Pb, Zn, Cu) and iron (Fe) in USDS from seven Russian cities.
- To reconstruct initial geochemical baselines for PHEs in urban environments.
- To develop and compare new criteria for assessing urban geochemical transformation and pollution.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of potentially harmful elements (PHEs) and conservative elements (CEs) in urban surface deposited sediment (USDS).
- Reconstruction of initial geochemical baselines using linear weighted fitting of PHEs as a function of CEs.
- Application of new criteria: percentage of polluted samples, average pollutant concentration, and weighting degree index (δ).
- Comparison with common criteria: PHE concentration and geo-accumulation index.
Main Results:
- Reconstructed average initial baseline concentrations for Pb, Cu, and Zn ranged from 17-52, 25-196, and 91-413 mg kg⁻¹, respectively.
- New criteria for assessing geochemical transformation and pollution were proposed and evaluated.
- The environmental ranking of cities varied significantly based on the assessment criteria used (total pollution vs. baseline change).
Conclusions:
- The study provides a robust method for reconstructing initial geochemical baselines in urban environments.
- New criteria offer a more nuanced assessment of urban geochemical transformation and pollution.
- Environmental rankings can differ substantially depending on the chosen pollution assessment method.
More Related Videos
10:31Detection and Recovery of Palladium, Gold and Cobalt Metals from the Urban Mine Using Novel Sensors/Adsorbents Designated with Nanoscale Wagon-wheel-shaped Pores
Published on: December 6, 2015
10:05Integrated Field Lysimetry and Porewater Sampling for Evaluation of Chemical Mobility in Soils and Established Vegetation
Published on: July 4, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
The Periodic Table and Organismal Elements
Periodic Table Provides Information...
The Periodic Table and Organismal Elements
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
Toxic Reactions: Overview
Toxicity falls into two primary categories: local and systemic.
Local toxicity appears at the exposure site, such as protein denaturation caused by caustic substances.
In contrast, systemic toxicity requires the toxic agent's absorption and distribution,...
Bioremediation