Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 29, 2025

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System
Published on: May 22, 2020
Significant ultrafine particle emissions from residential solid fuel combustion
Dongbin Wang1, Qing Li2, Guofeng Shen3
1State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China.
Residential solid fuel combustion releases significant ultrafine particles (UFPs), posing health risks. Current PM2.5 pollution metrics may underestimate UFP risks, necessitating focused attention on UFP control strategies.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Public Health
- Combustion Chemistry
Background:
- Particulate matter (PM) emissions from residential solid fuel combustion are a major air quality concern.
- Current pollution assessment relies on PM2.5 mass concentration, potentially overlooking risks from ultrafine particles (UFPs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate ultrafine particle emissions from residential solid fuel combustion.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of current control strategies on UFP emissions.
- To highlight the inadequacy of PM2.5 mass concentration as an sole indicator for UFP-induced health risks.
Main Methods:
- Laboratory-controlled combustion experiments.
- Real-world rural household combustion monitoring.
- Measurement of particle number and mass concentrations across various size ranges.
- Analysis of emission factors for coal and biomass fuels.
Main Results:
- Significant UFP emissions (2x10^15 to 2x10^16 particles/kg fuel) observed for both coal and biomass.
- UFPs constitute over 90% of total particle number concentration (3 nm to 10 μm).
- High PM2.5 mass emissions often occur early in combustion, while high particle number emissions peak later.
- Control strategies targeting PM2.5 reduction are not always effective for UFPs and can sometimes increase UFP emissions.
Conclusions:
- Overlooking UFPs in residential combustion emissions can lead to underestimated health risks, particularly for vulnerable populations.
- Current PM2.5-focused pollution control strategies may fail to adequately address UFP risks.
- Further research and specific control measures for UFPs are crucial for protecting public health from indoor air pollution.
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference
Flame Photometry: Overview

